2018
DOI: 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strategy utilizing ambulatory monitoring and home and clinic blood pressure measurements to optimize the safety evaluation of noncardiovascular drugs with potential for hemodynamic effects

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slightly higher increases in pulse rate were observed in the combination and mirabegron groups compared with the solifenacin group (1.0, 1.2, and 0.3 bpm, respectively). This finding was expected given the known effect of mirabegron on heart rate [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Slightly higher increases in pulse rate were observed in the combination and mirabegron groups compared with the solifenacin group (1.0, 1.2, and 0.3 bpm, respectively). This finding was expected given the known effect of mirabegron on heart rate [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A paper published last month in the journal Blood Pressure Monitoring by Weber and colleagues 18 is of note here. It discussed the employment of ABPM as part of a comprehensive blood pressure safety evaluation in patients with an overactive bladder (OAB) receiving solifenacin, mirabegron, or a combination of both compared with placebo.…”
Section: A Recent Study Employing Abpm Is Of Notementioning
confidence: 97%
“…All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP 15 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The number of samples was determined on the basis of previous reports [14][15][16]. Hence, we set a probability of 0.05 (two-sided), a power of 80%, and an effect size of 0.5.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%