2018
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strategy to Refine the Phenotyping Approach and Its Implementation to Predict Drug Clearance: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Simulation Study

Abstract: The phenotyping approach to predict drug metabolism activity is often hampered by a lack of correlation between the probe and the drug of interest. In this article, we present a strategy to refine the phenotyping approach based on a physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulation (implemented in Simcyp Simulator version 17) using previously published models. The apparent clearance (CL/F) of erlotinib was better predicted by the sum of caffeine and i.v. midazolam CL/F (r 2 = 0.60) compared to that of either pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our adherence to the FDA list aimed to minimize the selection bias and the number of studies with nonvalidated substrates. For instance, the oral clearance of nifedipine (the substrate in a phenobarbital study) is only modestly correlated with that of midazolam 36 . The oral clearance correlation between midazolam and simvastatin (which was included in the FDA list of sensitive CYP3A substrates) was even poorer than that of nifedipine 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our adherence to the FDA list aimed to minimize the selection bias and the number of studies with nonvalidated substrates. For instance, the oral clearance of nifedipine (the substrate in a phenobarbital study) is only modestly correlated with that of midazolam 36 . The oral clearance correlation between midazolam and simvastatin (which was included in the FDA list of sensitive CYP3A substrates) was even poorer than that of nifedipine 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a key determinant of a drug interaction magnitude is the fraction of the substrate eliminated by the induced pathways(s), the CYP3A substrates constituted a source of heterogeneity. Therefore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis with midazolam (fraction metabolized by CYP3A [ f m,CYP3A ] = .93) 28 and triazolam ( f m,CYP3A = .90; oral clearance highly correlated with that of midazolam) 36 as the only sensitive CYP3A substrates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the last 20 years various modeling approaches and software solutions were utilized to investigate various aspects of DXM pharmacokinetics, e.g., using GastroPlus ( Bolger et al, 2019 ), P-Pharm ( Moghadamnia et al, 2003 ), SAS ( Ito et al, 2010 ; Chiba et al, 2012 ), SimCYP ( Dickinson et al, 2007 ; Ke et al, 2013 ; Sager et al, 2014 ; Chen et al, 2016 ; Rougée et al, 2016 ; Adiwidjaja et al, 2018 ; Storelli et al, 2019b ; Machavaram et al, 2019 ), MATLAB ( Kim et al, 2017 ), or PK-Sim ( Rüdesheim et al, 2022 ). However, most of the work is difficult/impossible to validate or to build up on due to a lack of accessibility of models and software, and platform-dependency of the models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last 20 years various modeling approaches and software solutions were utilized to investigate various aspects of DXM pharmacokinetics, e.g. using GastroPlus (Bolger et al, 2019), P-Pharm (Moghadamnia et al, 2003), SAS (Ito et al, 2010; Chiba et al, 2012), SimCYP (Dickinson et al, 2007; Ke et al, 2013; Sager et al, 2014; Chen et al, 2016; Rougée et al, 2016; Adiwidjaja et al, 2018; Machavaram et al, 2019; Storelli et al, 2019b), MATLAB (Kim et al, 2017), or PK-Sim (Rüdesheim et al, 2022). However, most of the work is difficult/impossible to validate or to build up on due to a lack of accessibility of models and software, and platform-independence of the models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%