2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strategy to effectively make use of large volumes of climate data for climate change adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that regional climate models were used to downscale a small number (four for RCP4.5) of GCMs, and that even one single GCM can produce very different local and regional projections due to the presence of pronounced nondeterministic natural variability on decadal timescales (Deser et al 2012). Hence, estimates based on a small set of climate model simulations are subject to the "law of small numbers" (Benestad et al 2017), for which the estimates may be misleading, the true range underestimated and the real uncertainties appear to be smaller than they really are. Mezghani et al (2018) tested the influence of selecting a subset of global climate models to drive two downscaling strategies (Empirical-Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling, i.e., ESD and DD, respectively) on the resultant regional and local climate information.…”
Section: Climate Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that regional climate models were used to downscale a small number (four for RCP4.5) of GCMs, and that even one single GCM can produce very different local and regional projections due to the presence of pronounced nondeterministic natural variability on decadal timescales (Deser et al 2012). Hence, estimates based on a small set of climate model simulations are subject to the "law of small numbers" (Benestad et al 2017), for which the estimates may be misleading, the true range underestimated and the real uncertainties appear to be smaller than they really are. Mezghani et al (2018) tested the influence of selecting a subset of global climate models to drive two downscaling strategies (Empirical-Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling, i.e., ESD and DD, respectively) on the resultant regional and local climate information.…”
Section: Climate Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilities account for such variability, and the analysis presented here made use of the median of the simulated temperature from large multi-model ensembles and a Bayesian-inspired approach to account for both natural variability and model differences. Such ensembles cannot be considered to be unbiased statistical samples (Benestad et al, 2017b) as different models have similar biases since they share many components. The model differences, however, have been found to be less pronounced than the year-to-year variations and can for all intents and purposes be used as an imperfect description of the statistical spread when better information is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People have learnt to cope with climate variations and severe weather over historical times and have adapted to various weather-related risks. In this respect, climate can be regarded as the statistical description of various weather variables (Benestad et al, 2017a), giving a picture of "typical" types of weather and what to expect. This statistical description includes the mean, variance, autocorrelation, periodicity, and duration of various climatological events.…”
Section: Weather Statistics and Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having performed a subjective evaluation of the results obtained by the CCI method, it is clear that the automatically identified Mediterranean cyclones and, subsequently, the trajectory followed by each of them can also be found in the daily reanalysis maps that show the main fields at standard atmospheric levels. This shows and proves that the present results are correct and the method used herein is reliable as already stated when used in important and complex studies (Benestad and Chen, ; Neu, ; Benestad et al ., , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%