2001
DOI: 10.1086/318610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strategy for Identifying the Grid Stars for theSpace Interferometry Mission

Abstract: We present a strategy to identify several thousand stars that are astrometrically stable at the micro-arcsecond level for use in the SIM (Space Interferometry Mission) astrometric grid. The requirements on the grid stars make this a rather challenging task. Taking a variety of considerations into account we argue for K giants as the best type of stars for the grid, mainly because they can be located at much larger distances than any other type of star due to their intrinsic brightness. We show that it is possi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better reflect the actual velocity jitter and to get a reduced χ 2 closer to 1, we quadratically added 25 m/s to the individual errors. This jitter amplitude is common for a K giant with B − V = 1.35, a range where it may vary from 20 to 100 m/s (Frink et al 2001). The residuals show a slight negative slope, indicating a possible distant companion.…”
Section: Radial Velocity Data and Proposed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to better reflect the actual velocity jitter and to get a reduced χ 2 closer to 1, we quadratically added 25 m/s to the individual errors. This jitter amplitude is common for a K giant with B − V = 1.35, a range where it may vary from 20 to 100 m/s (Frink et al 2001). The residuals show a slight negative slope, indicating a possible distant companion.…”
Section: Radial Velocity Data and Proposed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the next two sections on astrometric contamination (°4) and implications (°5), I treat these two classes in parallel. In°6, I test the analytic formulae derived here by "" predicting ÏÏ the results of a Monte Carlo simulation by Frink et al (2001). I Ðnd excellent agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, reducing from 60 to 20 m s~1 would decrease the p RV number of stellar contaminants by * ln G(K) D 36%. It would not be possible to go below 20 m s~1, since this is the typical scale of photospheric Ñuctuations of K giants (Frink et al 2001). However, if need be, one could achieve the same e †ect with multiple measurements (assuming, as is almost certainly the case, that these Ñuctuations overwhelmingly have power on short timescales, so that they do not couple to the acceleration measurements).…”
Section: Reference Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations