“…Preventing a competitor from achieving the same or higher, resource stock levels, is feasible by either accelerating the flow of one's own resources, or slowing down (if possible) those of the competitor/imitator, or both. In this context, the management of the above mentioned tangible and intangible resource stocks associated with the operations performance objectives of both competitors, can be accomplished by regulating their associated resource flows through decision making in four broad operations strategy decision areas (Slack and Lewis, 2008;Lewis et al, 2013): i) capacity management decisions for regulating the capacity stock levels for the production of OEM's new products and for recycling by the OEMs, as well as for remanufacturing by the retailers, ii) supply chain and logistics management decisions which concern the flow of products (new and used) in the supply chain, and the way capacity is being used (Sheriff, et al, 2012;Xanthopoulos and Iakovou, 2010), iii) organisational learning and operational improvement decisions which concern the rate of improvement of manufacturing, remanufacturing, and recycling operations and consequently, the rate of accumulation of the production know-how resource stock, and iv) decisions on the rate of acquisition and use of product and process technology (Hazen, 2011). However, since both competitors have equal access to product and process technology factor markets, and products are not technologically complex, technology cannot be considered as a distinctive strategic decision area which contributes significantly to any operations strategic objective.…”