1997
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1997.11978025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“A Stranger to Its Laws”: Freedom, Civil Rights, and the Legal Ambiguity of Romer V. Evans (1996)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others posit that amicus briefs can provide influential legal arguments not otherwise contained in the parties' legal briefs on the merits. For example, some scholars contend that Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Romer v. Evans (1996) was substantially influenced by the amicus brief authored by Laurence Tribe and several other prominent law professors (Hasian & Parry-Giles, 1997). Citing Epstein and Walker (1995), Ivers and O'Connor (1987), and McGuire and Palmer (1995), among others, Spriggs and Wahlbeck (1997) state that scholars have made similar arguments regarding the influence of amici in other landmark cases, including Mapp v. Ohio (1961) andWebster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989).…”
Section: Amicus Curiaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others posit that amicus briefs can provide influential legal arguments not otherwise contained in the parties' legal briefs on the merits. For example, some scholars contend that Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Romer v. Evans (1996) was substantially influenced by the amicus brief authored by Laurence Tribe and several other prominent law professors (Hasian & Parry-Giles, 1997). Citing Epstein and Walker (1995), Ivers and O'Connor (1987), and McGuire and Palmer (1995), among others, Spriggs and Wahlbeck (1997) state that scholars have made similar arguments regarding the influence of amici in other landmark cases, including Mapp v. Ohio (1961) andWebster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989).…”
Section: Amicus Curiaementioning
confidence: 99%