2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cc02996h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strain-promoted alkyne–azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) reaction of a novel EpCAM aptamer–fluorescent conjugate for imaging of cancer cells

Abstract: For the first time, a novel EpCAM aptamer (SYL3C)-DIBO-AF594 fluorescent conjugate was synthesised by bioorthogonal chemistry utilizing a strain promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (copper free click) reaction (SPAAC). The ligation efficiency of SPAAC was improved by freeze-thaw cycles. The obtained conjugate showed target specific binding and aided in the imaging of various EpCAM positive cancer cell lines like MCF7, MDAMB453, Weri-RB1 and PC3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, aptamer SYL3C was identified and is currently widely used in the elucidation of cancer clinical samples, 53 immunostaining of cancer frozen tissues, 54 and imaging of cancer cells. 55 …”
Section: Aptamer-based Molecular Recognition For Biomarker Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, aptamer SYL3C was identified and is currently widely used in the elucidation of cancer clinical samples, 53 immunostaining of cancer frozen tissues, 54 and imaging of cancer cells. 55 …”
Section: Aptamer-based Molecular Recognition For Biomarker Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter plot of total EpCAM/anti‐EpCAM bond number versus cell surface area further revealed that for MCF‐7 and PC3 cells, the total number of EpCAM/anti‐EpCAM bonds was linearly proportional to cell surface area; however, for MCF‐10A and HeLa cells, such linear correlation was not observable (Figure d). These observations further supported positive and comparable EpCAM expression for MCF‐7 and PC3 cells and negative EpCAM expression for MCF‐10A and HeLa cells . Assuming homogenous distribution of EpCAM on cancer cell membranes, average EpCAM/anti‐EpCAM bond density C bond for MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, PC3, and HeLa cells were 1.36 ± 0.62 bonds μm −2 , 29.71 ± 2.66 bonds μm −2 , 34.36 ± 3.94 bonds μm −2 , and 9.29 ± 1.57 bonds μm −2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should note that the EpCAM/anti‐EpCAM bond quantities measured by the elasticity microcytometer were different from total EpCAM expression conventionally measured at the single cell level by immunostaining or fluorescence‐activated cell sorting. Nonetheless, the total numbers of EpCAM/anti‐EpCAM bonds on MCF‐10A, MCF‐7, PC3, and HeLa cells determined from the elasticity microcytometer were consistent and on the same order of magnitude with the total EpCAM expression data reported in the literature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aptamers and inhibitors require additional steps before conjugation with imaging agents, such modification could change their binding affinity to receptors. 16,37,38 Antibodies usually have high binding affinity and specificity, but their large size limits their tumor penetration. Several antibodies against PSMA have been applied for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%