2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr007996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A storage model approach to the assessment of snow depth trends

Abstract: [1] This paper introduces a stochastic storage model capable of assessing trends in daily snow depth series. The model allows for seasonal features, which permits the analysis of daily data. Breakpoint times, which occur when the observing station changes location or instrumentation, are shown to greatly influence estimated trend margins and are accounted for in this analysis. The model is fitted by numerically minimizing a sum of squares of daily prediction errors. Standard errors for the model parameters, us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these limitations, it is critical to focus on the findings where spatially coherent groups of stations exhibit similar trends with time rather than the absolute number of stations with positive or negative trends. The focus on spatial coherence of trends is also important because trends at individual stations may be affected by factors such as 1 7 7 station moves that are unrelated to changes in snow climatology (Kunkel et al, 2009;Woody et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given these limitations, it is critical to focus on the findings where spatially coherent groups of stations exhibit similar trends with time rather than the absolute number of stations with positive or negative trends. The focus on spatial coherence of trends is also important because trends at individual stations may be affected by factors such as 1 7 7 station moves that are unrelated to changes in snow climatology (Kunkel et al, 2009;Woody et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem with the use of cooperative observation stations is that minor station moves may affect the magnitude of observed trends (Kunkel et al, 2009;Woody et al, 2009). This problem may be mitigated, however, by focusing on geographic coherence in the trends rather than results from any single station.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted here that the trend estimates will be consistent regardless of the weighting factor [14]. The top panel in Figure 9 shows the estimated daily variances at the Fargo Station.…”
Section: Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, in Equation (10) is considered. First, following the derivation provided in the appendix of Woody et al (2009), one may compute the one-step-ahead predictions at each location as Klimko and Nelson (1978) [17]. Speci cally, it is shown that the parameter estimate Θ that minimizes S(Θ) is consistent and with asymptotically distributional (weak) convergenceθ…”
Section: Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation