2021
DOI: 10.5755/j01.itc.50.1.27351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stopping Criterion for the Training Process of the Specific Signal Generator

Abstract: Mathematical description of a complex signal is very important in engineering but nearly impossible in many occasions. The emergence of the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) shows the possibility to train a single neural network to be a Specific Signal Generator (SSG), which is only controlled by a random vector with several elements. However, there is no explicit criterion for the GAN training process to stop, and in real applications the training always stops after a certain big iteration. In this paper, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there is no consensus on the deterministic stopping criteria during GAN training that produce highquality synthetic data. Several works have already started to benchmark GANs to measure their evolution with respect to the quality of the generated data (for instance, [16,14,29]) and only a few of them have proposed a detention criterium not based on the visual inspection of the synthetic data (e.g., [5] and [17]). In fact, the former of these two papers proposes a stopping criterion that is closely related to the signal they generate, so that its direct application in other domains outside signal processing seems not very feasible.…”
Section: Problems In Gan Generation Procedures and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is no consensus on the deterministic stopping criteria during GAN training that produce highquality synthetic data. Several works have already started to benchmark GANs to measure their evolution with respect to the quality of the generated data (for instance, [16,14,29]) and only a few of them have proposed a detention criterium not based on the visual inspection of the synthetic data (e.g., [5] and [17]). In fact, the former of these two papers proposes a stopping criterion that is closely related to the signal they generate, so that its direct application in other domains outside signal processing seems not very feasible.…”
Section: Problems In Gan Generation Procedures and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%