2015
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic transcriptional switch model for single cell imaging data

Abstract: Gene expression is made up of inherently stochastic processes within single cells and can be modeled through stochastic reaction networks (SRNs). In particular, SRNs capture the features of intrinsic variability arising from intracellular biochemical processes. We extend current models for gene expression to allow the transcriptional process within an SRN to follow a random step or switch function which may be estimated using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). This stochastic switch model provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to model the process of transcription and extract the kinetic parameters of promoter switching, we augmented classic HMMs to account for memory (details about implementation of the method are given in Appendix 3). Similar approaches were recently introduced to study transcriptional dynamics in cell culture and tissue samples (Suter et al, 2011; Molina et al, 2013; Zechner et al, 2014; Zoller et al, 2015; Hey et al, 2015; Bronstein et al, 2015; Corrigan et al, 2016; Featherstone et al, 2016). We used simulated data to establish that mHMM reliably extracts the kinetic parameters of transcriptional bursting from live-imaging data (Appendix 4), providing an ideal tool for dissecting the contributions from individual bursting parameters to observed patterns of transcriptional activity across space and time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model the process of transcription and extract the kinetic parameters of promoter switching, we augmented classic HMMs to account for memory (details about implementation of the method are given in Appendix 3). Similar approaches were recently introduced to study transcriptional dynamics in cell culture and tissue samples (Suter et al, 2011; Molina et al, 2013; Zechner et al, 2014; Zoller et al, 2015; Hey et al, 2015; Bronstein et al, 2015; Corrigan et al, 2016; Featherstone et al, 2016). We used simulated data to establish that mHMM reliably extracts the kinetic parameters of transcriptional bursting from live-imaging data (Appendix 4), providing an ideal tool for dissecting the contributions from individual bursting parameters to observed patterns of transcriptional activity across space and time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive MH has been used in previous works on gene expression models in combination with fluorescent time-course data and flow cytometry data. 47,48…”
Section: The Metropolis-hastings and The Adaptive Metropolis Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To infer numbers of molecules, we require a model for the measurement noise generated by fluorescence microscopes. A common description of this error is additive Gaussian noise [1,2,4,18,36]. Writing N (y; µ, σ 2 ) for a Gaussian distribution in y with mean µ and standard deviation σ, y j (t) for the measured fluorescence of cell j at time point t, and ν for the fluorescence per molecule -the parameter that we wish to infer, we have…”
Section: Modelling Measurement Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their complexity, these models are no longer amenable to previous approaches [18,21], and we instead use Bayesian methods for the analyses of time-series. Briefly (see Methods for details), we employ the linear noise approximation [16,39] to describe fluctuations in the dynamics of bleaching and combine this approximation with a Kalman filter [36,40] to estimate the likelihood of the parameters. These parameters include homogenous parameters shared between all cells (ν and σ e ) and heterogeneous parameters that vary from cell to cell (λ 1,j , λ 2,j , and f j ).…”
Section: A Fluctuation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%