2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic threshold for an epidemic model with Beddington–DeAngelis incidence, delayed loss of immunity and Lévy noise perturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most epidemic models are driven by white noise, and many results have been achieved in this area [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, under severe environmental perturbations, such as avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and hurricanes, the continuity of solutions may be broken; accordingly, a jump process should be introduced to prevent and control diseases [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most epidemic models are driven by white noise, and many results have been achieved in this area [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, under severe environmental perturbations, such as avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and hurricanes, the continuity of solutions may be broken; accordingly, a jump process should be introduced to prevent and control diseases [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one may construct some more realistic but complex models, such as considering the effects of delay, complex network, pulse vaccination and Lévy noise. Some scholars have already done a great deal of work (see [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]). We leave these investigations for future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suffices to prove that P(τ = ∞) = 1, that is P(τ < t) = 0, ∀t > 0, we can see clearly that P(τ < t) ≤ P(τ n < t). We only need to show that lim sup n→∞ P(τ n < t) = 0 for this matter, referring to [35,36], we can take a similar function and use some approaches to prove the theorem. Then, we set a C 2 -function U: R 2 + → R + for all (S(t), I(t)) > 0:…”
Section: Theorem 21 the Region Is Almost Surely Positive Invariant Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%