2017 23rd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/iconac.2017.8081974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic shortest-path MDP model with dead ends for operating rooms planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the reviewed papers, about 66% incorporate some sort of variability and the surgery duration uncertainty is most frequently taken into account in both settings. [4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 24, 28, 35, 40, 42, 47, 48, 51, 78, 87, 89, 98, 99, 102, 107, 111, 123, 126-128, 135, 142-144, 152, 156, 159, 164, 166, 171, 172, 181, 186, 187, 189, 191, 193, 199, 200] [ 4, 5, 12, 16, 19, 24, 29, 35, 44, 45, 47, 58, 65, 72, 78, 79, 87, 94, 111, 115, 123, 126-128, 135, 138, 143, 144, 152, 156, 189, 191, 195, 200, 210] Demand 33% (51/30) [2, 13, 15, 21, 22, 25-27, 30, 36, 38, 43, 50, 52, 53, 63, 68, 70, 74, 80, 86, 88, 101, 103, 105, 106, 109, 117-121, 130, 134, 147, 148, 154, 161, 162, 169, 177, 179, 183, 185, 188, 190, 192, 201-203, 212] [ 15,22,33,34,36,38,39,43,50,63,68,70,86,103,109,117,119,120,149,151,161,169,170,177,185,190,192,196,201,202] Duration 54% (79/54) [3, 6, 8, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 36, 38, 41, 43, 49, 53, 55, 63, 68, 69, 74, 80, 86, 88, 90, 100, 101, 105, 106, 109, 112-114, 117, 119-122, 124,...…”
Section: Activity Uncertainty and Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the reviewed papers, about 66% incorporate some sort of variability and the surgery duration uncertainty is most frequently taken into account in both settings. [4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 24, 28, 35, 40, 42, 47, 48, 51, 78, 87, 89, 98, 99, 102, 107, 111, 123, 126-128, 135, 142-144, 152, 156, 159, 164, 166, 171, 172, 181, 186, 187, 189, 191, 193, 199, 200] [ 4, 5, 12, 16, 19, 24, 29, 35, 44, 45, 47, 58, 65, 72, 78, 79, 87, 94, 111, 115, 123, 126-128, 135, 138, 143, 144, 152, 156, 189, 191, 195, 200, 210] Demand 33% (51/30) [2, 13, 15, 21, 22, 25-27, 30, 36, 38, 43, 50, 52, 53, 63, 68, 70, 74, 80, 86, 88, 101, 103, 105, 106, 109, 117-121, 130, 134, 147, 148, 154, 161, 162, 169, 177, 179, 183, 185, 188, 190, 192, 201-203, 212] [ 15,22,33,34,36,38,39,43,50,63,68,70,86,103,109,117,119,120,149,151,161,169,170,177,185,190,192,196,201,202] Duration 54% (79/54) [3, 6, 8, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 36, 38, 41, 43, 49, 53, 55, 63, 68, 69, 74, 80, 86, 88, 90, 100, 101, 105, 106, 109, 112-114, 117, 119-122, 124,...…”
Section: Activity Uncertainty and Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other relevant approaches are: Abedini et al 2016, that developed a bin packing model with a multistep approach and a priority-type-duration rule; Molina-Pariente et al 2015, that tackled the problem of assigning an intervention date and an OR to a set of surgeries on the waiting list, minimizing the access time for patients with diverse clinical priority values; and Zhang et al 2017, that addressed the problem of OR planning with different demands from both elective patients and nonelective ones, with priorities in accordance with urgency levels and waiting times. However, bed management is not considered in these three last mentioned approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%