1998
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0805:asrtdm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stochastic Raindrop Time Distribution Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the occurrence of a 4-month dry period in Mediterranean semi-arid areas, it is not surprising to observe a particular behaviour concerning the length of the saturation period. We obtained a beginning for the saturation period after 113 d. Considering Table 1, Olsson (1993) used rainfall data collected at Lund (Sweden), Hubert and Carbonnel (1989) data obtained in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso), Lavergnat and Golé (1998) data from Palaiseau (France), Schmitt et al (1998) (Belgium) and Veneziano and Iacobellis (2002) data collected at Florence (Italy), and in each case the scale break for saturation is observed to be a few days, respectively 7, 21, 7, 3.5 and 3.5 d, which attests to the importance of the length of the saturation regime as well as the relative homogeneity of the rain support throughout the year. In other words, the length of the saturation period is very particular to the area considered.…”
Section: With the Sensor Detection Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Due to the occurrence of a 4-month dry period in Mediterranean semi-arid areas, it is not surprising to observe a particular behaviour concerning the length of the saturation period. We obtained a beginning for the saturation period after 113 d. Considering Table 1, Olsson (1993) used rainfall data collected at Lund (Sweden), Hubert and Carbonnel (1989) data obtained in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso), Lavergnat and Golé (1998) data from Palaiseau (France), Schmitt et al (1998) (Belgium) and Veneziano and Iacobellis (2002) data collected at Florence (Italy), and in each case the scale break for saturation is observed to be a few days, respectively 7, 21, 7, 3.5 and 3.5 d, which attests to the importance of the length of the saturation regime as well as the relative homogeneity of the rain support throughout the year. In other words, the length of the saturation period is very particular to the area considered.…”
Section: With the Sensor Detection Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Cheng et al (1995) observe = 1.6 in the waiting time between earthquakes, and a similar value for waiting time between`starquakes' in neutron stars. Lavergnat and Golé (1998) measured power law waiting times with = 0.68 between large raindrops. Smethurst and Williams (2001) find = 1.4 in the waiting times for a doctor appointment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations of Olsson et al (from Sweden) were later corroborated by Lavergnat and Golé [3] in an experiment performed near Paris. The latter study generated data on raindrop arrival times and sizes over a 14-month period, and confirmed the scaling r ∼ τ −0.82 over six orders of magnitude (from 0.01 to 10 4 minutes).…”
Section: Fractal Rain Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 59%