2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-007-9046-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stochastic Process Approach for Frequency-based Transit Assignment with Strict Capacity Constraints

Abstract: Transit assignment, Stochastic process, Strict capacity constraints, Day-to-day dynamics,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the authors are aware [17,18] are the first and only works which use a combined frequencybased and scheduled-based approach to transit assignment. The proposed model uses aggregate line frequencies to parameterize bus headways and a micro-simulator to enforce capacity constraints on individual vehicles, comparing the results with those obtained by [6] using the same network example.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the authors are aware [17,18] are the first and only works which use a combined frequencybased and scheduled-based approach to transit assignment. The proposed model uses aggregate line frequencies to parameterize bus headways and a micro-simulator to enforce capacity constraints on individual vehicles, comparing the results with those obtained by [6] using the same network example.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is solved branch and bound algorithm and its application is The Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway [15]. Minimizing perceived cost stochastic transit assignment model with route choice, day to-day variability, OD demand with varying different times, frequency variables is solved method of successive averages algorithm [16].…”
Section: Stochastic Transit Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity constraint approach (e.g., Lei and Chen, 2004; Lam et al, 1999; Cepeda et al, 2006) incorporates capacity constraints in transit assignment models to disallow flows on route sections or the number of vehicles to be greater than the corresponding capacity. The congestion cost function approach (e.g., Spiess and Florian, 1989; De Cea and Fernádez, 1993; Lam et al, 2002; Cominetti and Correa, 2001; Teklu, 2008) adopts unbounded increasing convex function to model the effect of in‐vehicle congestion due to insufficient capacity on waiting time. The concept of effective frequency is often used together with this approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the departure time adjustments over days cannot be considered. Therefore, dynamic transit models (e.g., Poon et al, 2004; Schmöcker et al, 2008; Teklu, 2008; Sumalee et al, 2009) have been developed over the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%