2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11071884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stochastic Model Predictive Control Approach for Joint Operational Scheduling and Hourly Reconfiguration of Distribution Systems

Abstract: Due to the recent developments in the practical implementation of remotely controlled switches (RCSs) in the smart distribution system infrastructure, distribution system operators face operational challenges in the hourly reconfigurable environment. This paper develops a stochastic Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework for operational scheduling of distribution systems with dynamic and adaptive hourly reconfiguration. The effect of coordinated integration of energy storage systems and demand response progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By determining the proposed switching sequences at each hour, the optimal topology of the distribution system is resulted. As can be seen in all the final topologies in Table 5, the network radiality without any islanded buses is preserved, which meet constraints (20)- (23). Moreover, the maximum allowable number of switching actions constraint in the day, stated in (24), is met.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By determining the proposed switching sequences at each hour, the optimal topology of the distribution system is resulted. As can be seen in all the final topologies in Table 5, the network radiality without any islanded buses is preserved, which meet constraints (20)- (23). Moreover, the maximum allowable number of switching actions constraint in the day, stated in (24), is met.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In case that bus j is the parent of bus i (β ij = 1) or bus i is the parent of bus j (β ji = 1), according to (21) the respective branch is in the spanning tree (X br = 1). In order to avoid islanded buses in the final topology, (22)- (23) state that except the substation bus, all the buses should have one parent.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The faulty region is isolated in case of a fault, and electrical loads with the highest priority are restored according to their levels of importance with regard to certain switching operations. Moreover, network reconfiguration (NR) can be performed for a variety of goals such as increasing DG penetration and thus fueling consumption reduction [7], meeting the highest possible energy demand [8], minimizing active power losses [9,10], reducing cost of energy and switching operations [11,12], improving power quality and reliability indices (e.g., mitigating voltage sag) [13], and system restoration with minimum loss in case of failure [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deng et al [25] present a mixed‐integer dynamic optimisation model for the optimal scheduling of ADNs with the objective of minimising the daily costs of electricity purchased from distribution substations. Esmaeili et al [26] develop a framework for operational model of distribution systems with dynamic reconfiguration considering coordinated integration of energy storage systems and demand response programmes to minimise the total costs including cost of total loss, switching cost, cost of bilateral contract with power generation owners and responsive loads (RLs), and cost of exchanging power with the wholesale market. Xu et al [27] introduce the multi‐agent system and multi‐layer electricity price response mechanism to construct an optimisation model of the distribution network layer, direct coordination source–load layer, and indirect coordination micro‐grid layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%