2021
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic model of epilithic algal succession and patch dynamics in streams

Abstract: Explaining spatiotemporal variability in metacommunities is challenging because conducting empirical studies that link mechanisms across scales is difficult. We developed a stochastic model of epilithic algal succession in streams to better understand the underlying interactions that drive patch dynamics at three levels of spatial hierarchy: patch, channel habitat, and reach. The state of an algal patch is specified by one of nine community types, which are defined by growth form. Ninety-two empirical data set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also show that the development of periphyton follows a succession of changes that are potentially governed by species interactions, as it has been previously reported [8, 9, 24, 49]. For instance while, as expected, only C. meneghiniana and A. pyrenaicum were detected at t 1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results also show that the development of periphyton follows a succession of changes that are potentially governed by species interactions, as it has been previously reported [8, 9, 24, 49]. For instance while, as expected, only C. meneghiniana and A. pyrenaicum were detected at t 1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results also show that the development of periphyton follows a succession of changes that are potentially governed by species interactions, as it has been previously reported 8 , 9 , 24 , 49 . For instance while, as expected, only C. meneghiniana and A. pyrenaicum were detected at t 1 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This species has a prostrate growth form (Goldsborough, 1994) and quickly colonises substrata (Robinson & Rushforth, 1987). Grazed communities tend to exhibit an increase in species with prostrate growth forms and species that are horizontally attached to substrata (DeNicola et al, 2021; Feminella & Hawkins, 1995; Passy & Larson, 2019). This is because the firm attachment of these diatoms to the substratum reduces grazing compared to pedunculated, floating or colonial forms, which are more easily reached by most grazers (Holomuzki & Biggs, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, grazers have distinctive mouthpieces and their foraging habits disturb the stream bed at differing intensities (Wellnitz & Ward, 2000), creating distinct habitat patches. This behaviour enhances the structural heterogeneity of substrata (Álvarez & Peckarsky, 2005) and causes increased variability in algal species composition among patches (DeNicola et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%