2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3091804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stochastic Geometry Approach to EMF Exposure Modeling

Abstract: Downlink exposure to electromagnetic fields due to cellular base stations in urban environments is studied using the stochastic geometry framework. A two-dimensional Poisson point process is assumed for the base station distribution. Mathematical expressions of statistics of exposure are derived from a simple propagation model taking into account the height of the base stations. The error on exposure made by taking a limited number of base stations, instead of the whole set, is quantified. The relative impact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, stochastic geometry has proved to be a reliable methodology to mathematically model the deployment of base stations that were unplanned, such as the Small Cells, which were instead deployed ad hoc to increase connectivity at hotspots or provide connectivity where no MCell was available [13]. There are some works that, through stochastic geometry, study the EMF assessment, [14] and [15], but they do not consider any sort of EMF mitigation or optimization. Several techniques to reduce the EMF while maximizing the performance of the network can be used in current wireless networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, stochastic geometry has proved to be a reliable methodology to mathematically model the deployment of base stations that were unplanned, such as the Small Cells, which were instead deployed ad hoc to increase connectivity at hotspots or provide connectivity where no MCell was available [13]. There are some works that, through stochastic geometry, study the EMF assessment, [14] and [15], but they do not consider any sort of EMF mitigation or optimization. Several techniques to reduce the EMF while maximizing the performance of the network can be used in current wireless networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the analytical evaluation of EMF exposure, authors in [23] considered a regular deployment of BSs under the assumption of a hexagonal mosaic territory. Employing stochastic geometry, more realistic modeling of irregularly distributed BSs was given in [24]. Compared with the experimental data of exposure in Brussels, Belgium, authors in [24] optimized the model parameters and verified the fitting effect of the proposed model.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing stochastic geometry, more realistic modeling of irregularly distributed BSs was given in [24]. Compared with the experimental data of exposure in Brussels, Belgium, authors in [24] optimized the model parameters and verified the fitting effect of the proposed model. In [25], the statistical received power at users was used to monitor the downlink exposure levels in a MIMO system using tools from stochastic geometry.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, after increasing the baseline density λ b , there are more BSs around the typical user, which has a potential to reduce the distance (x 0 ) between the typical user and its serving BS. Meanwhile, the shorter distance x 0 leads to lower transmit power in (23) and lower EMF exposure levels in (24). The improvement in coverage probability and the mitigation in EMF exposure in uplink reveals that dense deployment of BSs The contradicting trend (between the increase in uplink exposure and the decrease in downlink exposure when expanding the exclusion zone radius) reminds us that we cannot blindly protect the users by removing BSs near the restricted areas, which also causes both uplink and downlink coverage performance degradation as can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Uplink Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%