A stochastic framework to assess the performance of flood warning systems based on rainfall‐runoff modeling

Abstract

Nowadays, Flood Forecasting and Warning Systems (FFWSs) are known as the most inexpensive and efficient non‐structural measures for flood damage mitigation in the world. Benefit to cost of the FFWSs has been reported to be several times of other flood mitigation measures. Beside these advantages, uncertainty in flood predictions is a subject that may affect FFWS's reliability and the benefits of these systems. Determining the reliability of advanced flood warning systems based on the rainfall–runoff models is a challenge in assessment of the FFWS performance which is the subject of this study. In this paper, a stochastic methodology is proposed to provide the uncertainty band of the rainfall–runoff model and to calculate the probability of acceptable forecasts. The proposed method is based on Monte Carlo simulation and multivariate analysis of the predicted time and discharge error data sets. For this purpose, after the calibration of the rainfall–runoff model, the probability distributions of input calibration parameters and uncertainty band of the model are estimated through the Bayesian inference. Then, data sets of the time and discharge errors are calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation, and the probability of acceptable model forecasts is calculated by multivariate analysis of data using copula functions. The proposed approach was applied for a small watershed in Iran as a case study. The results showed using rainfall–runoff modeling based on real‐time precipitation is not enough to attain high performance for FFWSs in small watersheds, and it seems using weather forecasts as the inputs of rainfall–runoff models is essential to increase lead times and the reliability of FFWSs in small watersheds. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A methodology for optimal operation of pumping stations in urban drainage systems

“…In the copula method, for two variables x and y with marginal distributions FX(x) and GY(y), respectively, the joint distribution function H(x,y) can be represented as follows (Yazdi et al, 2014):…”

An integrated probabilistic assessment to analyse stochasticity of soil erosion in different restoration vegetation types

“…Based on the above precondition, the data-driven probabilistic models further simulated the stochastic runoff production by mapping or calibrating the difference between observed and predicted probabilistic values. As a result, the stochastic-conceptual approaches have formed an effective framework to model rainfall-runoff processes (Freeze, 1980), as well as to assess flood forecasting (Yazdi et al, 2014).…”

Performance Assessment of Hydrological Models Considering Acceptable Forecast Error Threshold

“…The correlation between the rainfall forecast error and flood forecast error is a challenging work since few literature has discussed the physical mechanism of the correlation [17,18]. Results are reasonable because the correlation is statistically significant through the case study of DHF reservoir, but the correlation between the variables of the rainfall forecast error and flood forecast error may not the same correlation between the modes of two failure modes, and hence, only the linear correlation is considered for the two forecast errors in the convenient method.…”

“…Nester et al [17] analyzed the scaling relationship with catchment area between the precipitation forecast error and hydrological simulation error. Yazdi et al [18] proposed a stochastic methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation and multivariate analysis to provide the uncertainty band of the rainfall-runoff model and to calculate the probability of the acceptable forecasts. They discussed the acceptable error for threshold discharge (amplitude error) and the acceptable error for the time (phase error).…”