2020
DOI: 10.38143/nyr.2020.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stílustulajdonítás szociokulturális szituáltsága. Funkcionális kognitív pragmatikai megközelítés

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Explorations of informants' beliefs, their metapragmatic reflections about style and social meanings rest on the assumption that speakers are able to exhibit a reflexive attitude to various linguistic constructions and the socio-cultural expectations, processes of style attribution that are inherent in the use of these constructions (cf. Tátrai-Ballagó 2020). In addition, we also assume that such reflections can be elicited by questionnaires inquiring about opinions in the form of open-ended questions (Bednarek 2011) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Explorations of informants' beliefs, their metapragmatic reflections about style and social meanings rest on the assumption that speakers are able to exhibit a reflexive attitude to various linguistic constructions and the socio-cultural expectations, processes of style attribution that are inherent in the use of these constructions (cf. Tátrai-Ballagó 2020). In addition, we also assume that such reflections can be elicited by questionnaires inquiring about opinions in the form of open-ended questions (Bednarek 2011) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as compared to Liu (2022), Szabó (2021Szabó ( , 2022 created rather different categories. Building on the pragmatic differentiation between inclusive (the 1PP includes the speaker, the addressee and third parties) and exclusive (the 1PP includes speaker and third parties) 1PP use (Laczkó-Tátrai 2015;Tátrai 2010Tátrai , 2011Tátrai , 2017 as well as on the literature on political communicaion (Beard, 2000;Fetzer & Bull, 2008;Íñigo-Mora, 2004;Szabó, 2020Szabó, , 2021Maitland & Wilson, 1987;Wilson, 1990;Zupnik, 1994), Szabó (2021Szabó ( , 2022 set up three major categories of we: weFamily, weParty, and weNation. WeFamily included the politician and one or more members of their family.…”
Section: The Linguistic Research Of Personalized Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This social cognitive starting point can be fruitfully combined with the pragmatic point of view, which lets the cognitive and sociocultural conditions of language use be seen together in relation to each other, describes language use as a social cognitive activity, and puts the problem of context-dependent, dynamic meaning construction into focus (see Verschueren 1999;Sandra et al eds. 2009;Tátrai 2011Tátrai , 2013Tátrai , 2017.…”
Section: The Model Of the Functional Cognitive Pragmaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%