Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Many enzymes are inhibited by their own substrates, leading to velocity curves that rise to a maximum and then descend as the substrate concentration increases. Substrate inhibition is often regarded as a biochemical oddity and experimental annoyance. We show, using several case studies, that substrate inhibition often has important biological functions. In each case we discuss, the biological significance is different. Substrate inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase results in a steady synthesis of dopamine despite large fluctuations in tyrosine due to meals. Substrate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase enhances the neural signal and allows rapid signal termination. Substrate inhibition of phosphofructokinase ensures that resources are not devoted to manufacturing ATP when it is plentiful. In folate metabolism, substrate inhibition maintains reactions rates in the face of substantial folate deprivation. Substrate inhibition of DNA methyltransferase serves to faithfully copy DNA methylation patterns when cells divide while preventing de novo methylation of methyl-free promoter regions. Keywords:.b iological function; enzyme kinetics; substrate inhibitionThe kinetics of an enzymatic reaction are typically studied by varying the concentration of substrate and plotting the rate of product formation as a function of substrate concentration. In the conventional case this yields a typical hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten curve, and a linear reciprocal LineweaverBurk plot, from which the kinetic constants of the enzyme can be calculated. A surprisingly large number of enzymes do not behave in this conventional way. Instead, their velocity curves rise to a maximum and then decline as the substrate concentration goes up. This phenomenon is referred to as substrate inhibition, and it is estimated that it occurs in some 20% of enzymes [1]. A partial list of enzymes that show substrate inhibition appears in Box 1.Substrate inhibition is often interpreted as an abnormality that comes from using artificially high substrate concentration in a laboratory setting. In a review article on the mechanisms of substrate inhibition in 1994, Kuehl [2] commented that ''although recognized early on as an almost universal phenomenon, it has nevertheless met an almost universal disinterest. Probably the main reason for this neglect is that the majority of enzymologists and many authorities in the field regard substrate inhibition as being almost always a nonphysiological phenomenon.'' There are several reasons for suspecting that substrate inhibition is not a pathological phenomenon, but a biologically relevant regulatory mechanism. First, in many cases normal substrate concentrations are to the right of the velocity maximum, which indicates that these enzymes typically operate under substrate inhibition. Second, many enzymes have specialized sites where a second substrate molecule can bind and act as an allosteric inhibitor. For those enzymes, substrate inhibition is clearly a specially evolved property. Third, evidence is accumulating that substr...
Many enzymes are inhibited by their own substrates, leading to velocity curves that rise to a maximum and then descend as the substrate concentration increases. Substrate inhibition is often regarded as a biochemical oddity and experimental annoyance. We show, using several case studies, that substrate inhibition often has important biological functions. In each case we discuss, the biological significance is different. Substrate inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase results in a steady synthesis of dopamine despite large fluctuations in tyrosine due to meals. Substrate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase enhances the neural signal and allows rapid signal termination. Substrate inhibition of phosphofructokinase ensures that resources are not devoted to manufacturing ATP when it is plentiful. In folate metabolism, substrate inhibition maintains reactions rates in the face of substantial folate deprivation. Substrate inhibition of DNA methyltransferase serves to faithfully copy DNA methylation patterns when cells divide while preventing de novo methylation of methyl-free promoter regions. Keywords:.b iological function; enzyme kinetics; substrate inhibitionThe kinetics of an enzymatic reaction are typically studied by varying the concentration of substrate and plotting the rate of product formation as a function of substrate concentration. In the conventional case this yields a typical hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten curve, and a linear reciprocal LineweaverBurk plot, from which the kinetic constants of the enzyme can be calculated. A surprisingly large number of enzymes do not behave in this conventional way. Instead, their velocity curves rise to a maximum and then decline as the substrate concentration goes up. This phenomenon is referred to as substrate inhibition, and it is estimated that it occurs in some 20% of enzymes [1]. A partial list of enzymes that show substrate inhibition appears in Box 1.Substrate inhibition is often interpreted as an abnormality that comes from using artificially high substrate concentration in a laboratory setting. In a review article on the mechanisms of substrate inhibition in 1994, Kuehl [2] commented that ''although recognized early on as an almost universal phenomenon, it has nevertheless met an almost universal disinterest. Probably the main reason for this neglect is that the majority of enzymologists and many authorities in the field regard substrate inhibition as being almost always a nonphysiological phenomenon.'' There are several reasons for suspecting that substrate inhibition is not a pathological phenomenon, but a biologically relevant regulatory mechanism. First, in many cases normal substrate concentrations are to the right of the velocity maximum, which indicates that these enzymes typically operate under substrate inhibition. Second, many enzymes have specialized sites where a second substrate molecule can bind and act as an allosteric inhibitor. For those enzymes, substrate inhibition is clearly a specially evolved property. Third, evidence is accumulating that substr...
The synthesis of tacrine-thiadiazolidinone hybrids is described. These compounds are designed as dual acetylcholinesterase inhibitors binding simultaneously to the peripheral and catalytic sites of the enzyme. All tested compounds exhibit significant AChE inhibitory activity. Competition assays using propidium as reference of selective ligand for the peripheral anionic site on acetylcholinesterase indicates the influence of the designed compounds over the peripheral site. They can be considered as new leads in the optimization of Alzheimer's disease modifying agents.
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an enzyme of the serine hydrolase superfamily and a mediator of the signal transmission at cholinergic synapses catalysing acetylcholine cleavage into an acetate and a choline. This enzyme is vulnerable to covalent inhibition by organophosphate compounds. The covalent inhibition of AChE does not revert spontaneously and in order to restore catalytic activity known reactivator compounds have limited action. Simulations of VX-inhibited AChE reactivation by pralidoxime, a classical reactivator, were performed by QM/MM. These simulations allowed for a broader view of the effect of protonation states of active site residues. These calculations provide evidence for the role of Glu202, which needs to be protonated for reactivation to occur. In situ deprotonation of 2-PAM was also explored in both protonation states of Glu202, showing that His447 is able to deprotonate 2-PAM with the assistance of Glu202. Since the active site of serine hydrolases is highly conserved, this work shades new insights on the interplay between the triad residues of the catalytic center and this glutamate newly identified as protonatable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.