2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A STEM e-class in action: A case study for asynchronous one-shot library instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the promising directions for asynchronous instruction, it is important to take into account the existing limitations and inequities with this model. Technological requirements and costs (e.g., internet connection, computer), online learning curve barriers, and accessibility issues are critical disadvantages for students (Tomaszewski, 2021). Given the absence of an instructor and other students typically found in synchronous learning environments, social engagement in asynchronous instruction is also a common issue for consideration (Maheshwari et al, 2021).…”
Section: Asynchronous Instruction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the promising directions for asynchronous instruction, it is important to take into account the existing limitations and inequities with this model. Technological requirements and costs (e.g., internet connection, computer), online learning curve barriers, and accessibility issues are critical disadvantages for students (Tomaszewski, 2021). Given the absence of an instructor and other students typically found in synchronous learning environments, social engagement in asynchronous instruction is also a common issue for consideration (Maheshwari et al, 2021).…”
Section: Asynchronous Instruction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptation of the textbook into Brightspace facilitated the use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles. As the demand for asynchronous instructional material grows, many libraries are embedding instructional content within their LMS, allowing students to learn asynchronously at their own pace and using ways to incentivize participation (Allen, 2017;Khailova & Bernstein, 2021;Tomaszewski, 2021). UDL has three main principles as outlined by CAST ( 2018): (a) provide multiple means of engagement, (b) provide multiple means of representation, and (c) provide multiple means of action and expression.…”
Section: Phase Ii: Toolkit With 30 Three-minute Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all the library sessions were one-time sessions for a duration between 50 and 110 minutes (Rodriguez 2016;Whitver and Lo 2017;Berg 2018;Budhai and Williams 2021;Cowden et al 2021;Morin, 2021). However, there was also a shared program for 2 to 5 sessions, with a duration of 50 to 110 minutes (Carroll 2016;Tomaszweski 2021). The library instruction programs were mainly targeted to 1styear and 2nd-year students (Carroll 2016;Kaneko 2018;Budhai and Williams 2021;Morin 2021).…”
Section: Findings Library Instruction Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The library instruction programs were mainly targeted to 1styear and 2nd-year students (Carroll 2016;Kaneko 2018;Budhai and Williams 2021;Morin 2021). For the first-year students, the material given focused on the introduction to the library, search strategy, scientific database, information source evaluation (Tomaszweski 2021), scientific writing (Budhai and Williams, 2021), identifying fake news, searching the catalog (Marchis, 2018), corporate media, media introduction (Tewell, 2018), and introduction to the campus (Morin, 2021), and the 2nd-year students were taught about dissertation search (Homol, 2018), subject searching, library research, finding full text, argumentative writing, research paper, and plagiarism (Gariepy, 2016). The library instruction program also aimed to introduce the student to campus life.…”
Section: Findings Library Instruction Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation