A Steady-State Cosmology

Assis, A. K. T.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1225-1_10

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Starting with Zwicky (Zwicky 1929(Zwicky , 1933 and continuing with Hubble and Tolman (Hubble & Tolman 1935;Hubble 1936). A non-expanding universe explanation for the cosmological redshift is also found in many other publications: (Finlay-Freundlich 1953Born 1954Born , 1953Pecker 1972;Jaakkola et al 1975;Chastel 1976;Maric et al 1976;Jaakkola et al 1979;Chow 1981;Laviolette 1986;Reber 1986;Crawford 1987;Kierein 1988;Marmet & Reber 1989;Arp et al 1990;Vigier 1990;Assis 1993;Ostermann 2004;Bunn & Hogg 2009;Holushko 2012;Sanejouand 2022).…”

Section: Stationary Universessupporting

confidence: 64%

“…In fact, because these values were more accurate than those initially predicted by proponents of the Big Bang (Alpher, Herman and Gamow (Alpher & Herman 1948;Gamow 1953Gamow , 1961), Assis and Neves (Assis & Neves 1995) concluded that the CMB provides evidence for a non-expanding universe rather than for an expanding one. Other non-Big Bang explanations for the origin of the CMB are: (Layzer & Hively 1973;Rees 1978;Carr 1981;Wright 1982;Assis 1993;Fahr & Zönnchen 2009).…”

Section: Cosmic Microwave Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cosmological Gravitational Redshift and Hubble Tension

III

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For almost a century since its first measurement by Hubble in 1929 the value of the Hubble constant, H, has been the subject of intense debate. In the last few years a new dimension has been added to this debate because there appears to be a significant discrepancy between the values of H derived from present-day universe (cepheids, supernova, lensed quasars, tip of the red giant branch), which are minimally dependent on cosmological theory and those derived from early universe observations (cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillations), which are based on the standard cosmological theory, $\Lambda CDM$, whereby $\Lambda CDM$ in turn is based on the assumption that the universe is expanding. This discrepancy is known as Hubble tension. We resolve the Hubble tension by introducing a universe which is govern by the Taub-NUT solution to the field equations of general relativity. The Taub-NUT universe is not expanding. In this universe the observed cosmological redshift is due to the gravitational redshift associated with the Taub-Nut solution, which we refer to as cosmological gravitational redshift. Time dilation in this stationary universe has the same dependency on redshift, that generally has been seen as proof that space is expanding.

show abstract

Section: Stationary Universessupporting

confidence: 64%

Section: Cosmic Microwave Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cosmological Gravitational Redshift and Hubble Tension

III

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Assis discussed the limb effect and concluded that the tired light theory provides a satisfactory explanation. He suggested that the redshift was due to the interaction of light with the atmosphere of the Sun while passing through it [16].…”

Section: Limb Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tired Light Denies the Big Bang

Shao¹,

Wang²,

Gao³

2019

Redefining Standard Model Cosmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

More and more problems related to Big Bang have been appeared in recent years. All the problems are due to the Doppler interpretation of redshift. The "tired light" theory, proposed in 1929 by Zwicky and most recently developed by Shao in 2013, gives a new explanation for redshift. The theory has shown that the redshift is induced from the energy loss of photons by the interaction with material particles on their journey through cosmological space. The basic principles related to the energy transfer are mainly the mass-energy equivalence and the Lorentz theory. Problems, such as super velocity, the horizon problem, the cosmological microwave background radiation, and Olbers' paradox, vanish in the cosmological model of "tired light" theory. The model describes a boundless and timeless Cosmos.

show abstract

The Redshift Revisited

Assis¹,

Neves²

1995

Plasma Astrophysics and Cosmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Steady-State Cosmology

Cited by 7 publications

References 29 publications

Cosmological Gravitational Redshift and Hubble Tension

Cosmological Gravitational Redshift and Hubble Tension

Tired Light Denies the Big Bang

The Redshift Revisited

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About