2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2019.2952668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stator Flux Observer With Phase Self-Tuning for Direct Torque Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The torque control gain A has a complicated relationship with the permanent magnet flux. Since the torque angle  is generally small, it can be set to zero in the control system, then the torque control gain can be simplified as (20) For the PMSM used in this paper, the permanent magnet flux dominates the stator flux, thus the control gain is sensitive to the permanent magnet flux. On the other hand, the difference between the stator flux and the permanent magnet flux is small when the permanent magnet flux equals its nominal value, hence the control gain is insensitive to the d-and q-axis inductances.…”
Section: B the Effect Of The Mismatched Torque Control Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The torque control gain A has a complicated relationship with the permanent magnet flux. Since the torque angle  is generally small, it can be set to zero in the control system, then the torque control gain can be simplified as (20) For the PMSM used in this paper, the permanent magnet flux dominates the stator flux, thus the control gain is sensitive to the permanent magnet flux. On the other hand, the difference between the stator flux and the permanent magnet flux is small when the permanent magnet flux equals its nominal value, hence the control gain is insensitive to the d-and q-axis inductances.…”
Section: B the Effect Of The Mismatched Torque Control Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed-loop flux observer shows better robustness to parameter variations than the current model in the high-speed range and higher accuracy than the voltage model in the low-speed range [18], thus it can be used to realize wide-speed sensorless control [19]. In [20], a stator flux observer with phase self-tuning is proposed to improve the robustness of the sensorless control system to parameter variations. Since no high dynamic performance is required, the one-step delay in digital system is not considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the PMSMs are typically strong coupling nonlinear system, which is easy to be affected by uncertain factors such as the change of motor parameters and external load disturbance in practical application. To achieve effective control of the nonlinear systems, many control strategies have been studied, for instance, sliding mode control (Barambones and Alkorta, 2014; Song et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2018; Zhu et al, 2020), direct torque control (Lin et al, 2020; Yip et al, 2020), adaptive control (Yu et al, 2020), backstepping control (Tong et al, 2011b; Yu et al, 2017), robust control (Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2020a), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the common difficulty for the flux-linkage-based SLC is that the rotor position estimation relies heavily on the accuracy of the estimated stator flux linkage magnitude and angle, which can be easily influenced by factors such as variation of resistance and potential nonlinearity with low B-EMF at high current. Hence, recent studies mostly focus on enhancing the accuracy of the stator flux linkage estimator [14], [15], [18], [26] rather than developing methods to reduce the dependence on stator flux linkage components (i.e., magnitude and phase angle) in SLC calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%