2017
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1402914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical test on the local effects of spatially structured variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since conditional permutation assumes that the local and (conditional, without x i ) global distributions of x are equivalent, perhaps the divergence between analytical and conditional permutations is driven by local spatial heterogeneity. Ord and Getis (2012) propose a measure of local spatial heterogeneity (LOSH), and very recently an implementation has been added to spdep thanks to Rene Westerholt in connection with Westerholt et al (2015) and Westerholt et al (2018). The implementation also includes inferential mechanisms proposed by Xu et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since conditional permutation assumes that the local and (conditional, without x i ) global distributions of x are equivalent, perhaps the divergence between analytical and conditional permutations is driven by local spatial heterogeneity. Ord and Getis (2012) propose a measure of local spatial heterogeneity (LOSH), and very recently an implementation has been added to spdep thanks to Rene Westerholt in connection with Westerholt et al (2015) and Westerholt et al (2018). The implementation also includes inferential mechanisms proposed by Xu et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of the metric range from identifying rare earth contamination (Yuan, Cave, and Zhang 2018) to analysing land cover change patterns (Das and Ghosh 2017). Throughout the years, Moran's I has also motivated several methodological expansions, analysing for example spatial heteroskedasticity (Ord and Getis 2012) and local spatial dispersion (Westerholt et al 2018). Moran's I has also seen some expansions into the spatio-temporal domain.…”
Section: Related Work Autocorrelation Metrics For Spatio-temporal Phe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al (2014) have investigated the distributional properties of LOSH and recommend a Monte Carlo strategy for inference instead of the parametric chi-square test originally proposed. Based on LOSH, Westerholt et al (2018) develop a test for strictly local spatial heteroscedasticity to characterise spatial variance in subregions regardless of other locations. Background is the detection of pronounced variances that may only stand out within small subregions but not in a global comparison.…”
Section: Spatial Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%