2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38629-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Statistical Test of Heterogeneous Subgraph Densities to Assess Clusterability

Abstract: Determining if a graph displays a clustered structure prior to subjecting it to any cluster detection technique has recently gained attention in the literature. Attempts to group graph vertices into clusters when a graph does not have a clustered structure is not only a waste of time but will also lead to misleading conclusions. To address this problem, we introduce a novel statistical test, the δ-test, which is based on comparisons of local and global densities. Our goal is to assess whether a given graph mee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will further make similar observations for other algorithms on this dataset. Such instability may mean that this dataset does not have a clear community structure (which can sometimes be the case for real-world networks [18]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will further make similar observations for other algorithms on this dataset. Such instability may mean that this dataset does not have a clear community structure (which can sometimes be the case for real-world networks [18]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, clusters are arguably uninformative in the case of complete graphs. In fact, the topic of clusterability, the assessment of a graph's suitability to a clustering exercise, has received some attention in the recent literature [15,16,5,28]. For the purpose of this article, we restrict our attention to clusterable, undirected, unweighted and weighted graphs, with no self loops or multiple edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%