1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf00879707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical model of the geomagnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such model is that presented by Irving & Ward (1964). It expresses the latitude dependence of the circular standard deviation of magnetic directions, resulting from a rapidly varying non-dipole component superimposed on a steady axial dipole field.…”
Section: Magnitude Of the Non-dipole Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One such model is that presented by Irving & Ward (1964). It expresses the latitude dependence of the circular standard deviation of magnetic directions, resulting from a rapidly varying non-dipole component superimposed on a steady axial dipole field.…”
Section: Magnitude Of the Non-dipole Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a necessary requirement for application of the model, which could not legitimately be applied to a purely dipole behaviour. The application of the data to Irving & Ward's (1964) model is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Magnitude Of the Non-dipole Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the field itself is studied, then the variation becomes less as the absolute latitude of the observation is increased [Irving and Ward, 1964]. If, however, VGPs are studied, then the scatter increases as higher absolute latitudes of observation are approached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models for secular variation proposed so far aimed mostly at explaining the latitude dependence of angular dispersion of the geomagnetic field, global trend of which is clear and physically meaningful. IRVING and WARD (1964) considered the model A to explain the latitude dependence by the field of a fixed geocentric dipole and randomly oriented nondipole fields with a constant intensity. Model B by CREER et al (1959) is based entirely on a wobble of geocentric dipole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%