2007
DOI: 10.1080/09593960701189853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical investigation of inventory shrinkage in a large retail chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the overall scale of the problem of shrinkage is readily identifi able from the various surveys undertaken around the world, trying to ascertain the extent to which the various causes of shrinkage are responsible for loss is much more problematic ( Bernstein, 1963 ;Baumer and Rosenbaum, 1984 ;Turbin, 1998 ;Hennessee, 2003 ;Howell and Proudlove, 2007 ). Typically, shrinkage is broken down into four main types: external theft, internal theft, process or administrative errors and inter-company fraud.…”
Section: Retail Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the overall scale of the problem of shrinkage is readily identifi able from the various surveys undertaken around the world, trying to ascertain the extent to which the various causes of shrinkage are responsible for loss is much more problematic ( Bernstein, 1963 ;Baumer and Rosenbaum, 1984 ;Turbin, 1998 ;Hennessee, 2003 ;Howell and Proudlove, 2007 ). Typically, shrinkage is broken down into four main types: external theft, internal theft, process or administrative errors and inter-company fraud.…”
Section: Retail Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in terms of the loss of merchandise due to theft, fraud, administrative error, damage or wastage (Howell and Proudlove, 2007;Rekik and Sahin, 2012). Despite the crucial commercial cost-relevance of shrinkage at a store level, the logistics of unsaleable (food and non-food) products at the point of sale have been widely neglected in the instore operations and logistics literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portanto, a justificativa para a inclusão da densidade de funcionário seria, dentro da perspectiva do comportamento socialmente indesejável sob a influência de terceiros e do contexto social, que quanto maior o número de empregados por metro quadrado, os indivíduos devem perceber menos oportunidades de se engajar em furto (Hollinger & Adams, 2007;Howell & Proudlove, 2007). Também, para desafiar a intuição de que um grande número de funcionários dificultaria os processos de controle, uma vez que só há um sóciooperador em cada uma das unidades para supervisioná-los.…”
Section: Forma De Mensuração Das Perdasunclassified