1975
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1975.3839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Statistical Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Family of Gravity Models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the R 2 statistics has been argued by several researchers due to its insensitivity to variations in model specification and missing concept to evaluate model performance across different data sets (Black and Salter, 1975;Wilson, 1976). The information-based statistics originated from "information gain statistics" in Kullback and Leibler (1951) includes the phi statistics, the psi statistics, and the measure of absolute entropy difference.…”
Section: Validation Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the R 2 statistics has been argued by several researchers due to its insensitivity to variations in model specification and missing concept to evaluate model performance across different data sets (Black and Salter, 1975;Wilson, 1976). The information-based statistics originated from "information gain statistics" in Kullback and Leibler (1951) includes the phi statistics, the psi statistics, and the measure of absolute entropy difference.…”
Section: Validation Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractiveness exponent was set at 0.5, for example, and the OAC beta values are visually rather than programmatically calibrated. Other impedance functions could be evaluated and tested through more detailed statistical evaluation (see Black and Salter 1975).…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient was also evaluated by Black & Salter (1975), who selected it as one of three measures for evaluating the fit of gravity models. They noted that the correlation coefficient was not very sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%