1982
DOI: 10.2307/2287778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Statistical Evaluation of Multiplicative Congruential Random Number Generators with Modulus 2 31 - 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the testing allows critically evaluating the efficiency of three different random number algorithms from a spatial simulation perspective, even if it is not an exhaustive alternative to the wide range of existing uniform generator tests (Fishman and Moore, 1982;Fishman and Moore, 1985;Hopkins, 1983;Knuth, 1981;Marsaglia, 1972).…”
Section: Some Practical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the testing allows critically evaluating the efficiency of three different random number algorithms from a spatial simulation perspective, even if it is not an exhaustive alternative to the wide range of existing uniform generator tests (Fishman and Moore, 1982;Fishman and Moore, 1985;Hopkins, 1983;Knuth, 1981;Marsaglia, 1972).…”
Section: Some Practical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform deviate uses a prime modulus multiplicative generator with modulus 213' -1 and multiplier 397204094 (Fishman and Moore, 1982;Tukey, 1977). Non-fathers were matched to teen fathers two to one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each replicate k, we generated a unique seed as the integer part of a random number uniformly distributed over the interval (0, 1) using the SAS RANUNI function (Fishman and Moore 1982), multiplied by a million. The replicate seeds were used to generate the permanent random numbers assigned to all enterprises in the frame population at time 0 (2009) and to the new enterprises in the frame population at time 1 (2010).…”
Section: Simulation Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%