2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
179
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, similarity interpreted as a measure of general or widespread agreement, based on the use of a metric or distance function, is usually regarded as a criteria to use in measuring consensus [15,18,40,50]. By combining both consistency and similarity functions, Herrera-Viedma et al [29] developed a feedback mechanism to provide advice to experts in order to increase the consensus level of the group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, similarity interpreted as a measure of general or widespread agreement, based on the use of a metric or distance function, is usually regarded as a criteria to use in measuring consensus [15,18,40,50]. By combining both consistency and similarity functions, Herrera-Viedma et al [29] developed a feedback mechanism to provide advice to experts in order to increase the consensus level of the group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate agreement within a group of experts could be facilitated with the provision of a measurement of the consensus level [11,26]. According to the decision information expressed by interval-valued trust functions, we will introduce the definition of consensus degree (CD) on three levels: Consensus degree on elements of alternatives, Consensus degree on alternatives and Consensus degree on the decision matrix.…”
Section: The Definition Of Consensus Degree (Cd) With Interval-valuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be an interesting future research to find out possible relationships among preferences, self-confidence assessments and results. Meanwhile, the consensus problem is a hot topic in GDM [2,7,10,17,32,37], and it will be interesting to investigate the consensus reaching model in GDM based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%