1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(99)00005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical approach to determination of a mineral lineation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the threshold velocity of Nautilus shells is nearly constant, regardless of bottom type. Table 2 and Figures 3 and 4 show the results of the experimental phase on restraint orientation: (1) most shells Abbreviations (see also Masuda et al, 1999;and Davis, 2002); , mean restraint direction; , mean resultant length; d 0 , confidence interval for R mean direction ( pϽ0.05). (2) the orientations exhibit nearly bilateral symmetry-the orientation range for shells with their left sides upward was 180-190Њ, and for those with their right sides upward was 170-180Њ; (3) larger shells showed a stronger preferred orientation; (4) shells where the body chambers were cut artificially showed a wide array of orientations; (5) the numbers of shells with left or right sides upward were nearly identical; (6) shells with their left side upward tended to settle on the right half of the flume, facing downstream, and vice versa (especially for larger shells; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the threshold velocity of Nautilus shells is nearly constant, regardless of bottom type. Table 2 and Figures 3 and 4 show the results of the experimental phase on restraint orientation: (1) most shells Abbreviations (see also Masuda et al, 1999;and Davis, 2002); , mean restraint direction; , mean resultant length; d 0 , confidence interval for R mean direction ( pϽ0.05). (2) the orientations exhibit nearly bilateral symmetry-the orientation range for shells with their left sides upward was 180-190Њ, and for those with their right sides upward was 170-180Њ; (3) larger shells showed a stronger preferred orientation; (4) shells where the body chambers were cut artificially showed a wide array of orientations; (5) the numbers of shells with left or right sides upward were nearly identical; (6) shells with their left side upward tended to settle on the right half of the flume, facing downstream, and vice versa (especially for larger shells; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). The lineation is defined by the alignment of tourmaline long axes upon the foliation, based on the method of Masuda et al (1999). We selected tourmaline grains with long axes within ±15°of the mineral lineation on the foliation surface in accordance with the procedure described by Masuda et al (2011).…”
Section: Dataset Used For the Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods available to quantify the SPO like R f − Φ method (Ramsay 1967), Paror and Surfor method (Panozzo Heilbronner 1992) and von Mises distribution (Masuda et al 1999;Piazolo and Passchier 2002). In the present study, von Mises distribution is used to obtain the statistical concentration parameter (k).…”
Section: Shape Preferred Orientation (Spo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher value of k implies stronger preferred orientation of minerals. The statistical details about k is provided by Masuda et al (1999).…”
Section: Shape Preferred Orientation (Spo)mentioning
confidence: 99%