2007
DOI: 10.1175/jam2489.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Statistical and Physical Description of Hydrometeor Distributions in Colorado Snowstorms Using a Video Disdrometer

Abstract: Winter-storm hydrometeor distributions along the Front Range in eastern Colorado are studied with a ground-based two-dimensional video disdrometer. The instrument provides shape, size, and terminal velocity information for particles that are larger than about 0.4 mm. The dataset is used to determine the form of particle size distributions (PSDs) and to search for useful interrelationships among the governing parameters of assumed distribution forms and environmental factors. Snowfalls are dominated by almost s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
193
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
26
193
6
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows probability distributions for maximum dimension D max , equivalent radius r eq , aspect ratio α, orientation θ, complexity χ and fall speed V . Median values with lower and upper quartiles for these quantities (Barthazy and Schefold, 2006;Brandes et al, 2007Brandes et al, , 2008Gunn, 1967;Heymsfield and Westbrook, 2010;Magono and Nakamura, 1965;Mitchell et al, 1990;Yuter et al, 2006;Zawadzki et al, 2010). The hydrometeors that were observed tended to have low complexity, with a clear preference for a near unity aspect ratio, suggesting a dominance of riming.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3 shows probability distributions for maximum dimension D max , equivalent radius r eq , aspect ratio α, orientation θ, complexity χ and fall speed V . Median values with lower and upper quartiles for these quantities (Barthazy and Schefold, 2006;Brandes et al, 2007Brandes et al, , 2008Gunn, 1967;Heymsfield and Westbrook, 2010;Magono and Nakamura, 1965;Mitchell et al, 1990;Yuter et al, 2006;Zawadzki et al, 2010). The hydrometeors that were observed tended to have low complexity, with a clear preference for a near unity aspect ratio, suggesting a dominance of riming.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the disdrometer measures the size of the cross-sectional area instead of the maximum dimension of non-spherical particles. Assuming that the ice crystals fall randomly oriented through the sensitive volume (Brandes et al, 2007), Lempio et al (2007) found from theoretical experiments using a ray tracing model (Macke et al, 1998) that the products of the terminal velocity and the equivalent liquid water content, as a function of the cross-sectional area, for different types of snow crystals are of the same order of magnitude. That allows one common parameterization to be used for all kinds of crystals; for practical reasons, lump graupel was chosen.…”
Section: Shipboard Odm 470 Optical Disdrometer Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, disdrometer observations of particle size distributions (PSDs) in concert with observations of radar reflectivity or accumulated snow mass have been used to estimate snow bulk and microphysical properties. Brandes et al (2007) used 2-D video disdrometer and snow accumulation observations to estimate snow bulk densities. Huang et al (2010) also used 2-D video disdrometer observations, along with C-band radar reflectivities, to estimate the parameters of snow particle massdimension relations.…”
Section: N B Wood Et Al: Characterization Of Disdrometer Uncertainmentioning
confidence: 99%