2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01482.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical analysis of ‘rule-out’ diagnoses in outpatient health insurance claims in Japan

Abstract: The existence of rule-out diagnoses affects the results of statistics based on HIC data. Japanese statistics based on HIC data should be improved by utilizing the information on rule-out diagnoses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Japan's health insurance system of fee‐for‐service reimbursement dictates that each clinical procedure be justified by a corresponding diagnosis. In addition, an unconfirmed or disproved diagnosis might appear on the claim as a tentative or ‘rule out’ diagnosis . However, CP diagnosis is unlikely to be tentative because most pediatricians are very cautious to avoid labeling those children without CP as having this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Japan's health insurance system of fee‐for‐service reimbursement dictates that each clinical procedure be justified by a corresponding diagnosis. In addition, an unconfirmed or disproved diagnosis might appear on the claim as a tentative or ‘rule out’ diagnosis . However, CP diagnosis is unlikely to be tentative because most pediatricians are very cautious to avoid labeling those children without CP as having this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, HICs contain not only confirmed diagnoses but also unconfirmed or disproved diagnoses, because each clinical procedure must be justified by a corresponding diagnosis; as a result, rule-out diagnoses are included in the HICs to ensure reimbursement for these clinical procedures, even when the results show that the suspected diseases are not present. 20 , 21 Assessment of the validity of diagnoses described on HICs and accuracy of coding for the diagnoses on HICs in Japan awaits further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rule-out diagnoses account for a considerable portion of diagnoses contained in health insurance claims, and many are recorded to justify reimbursement. 23 Although diagnoses contained in health insurance claims are not free from bias, PDM analysis that excludes rule-out diagnoses is far more accurate than classification by principal diagnoses. 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%