2001
DOI: 10.1088/1469-7688/1/3/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical analysis of log-periodic precursors to financial crashes*

Abstract: Motivated by the hypothesis that financial crashes are macroscopic examples of critical phenomena associated with a discrete scaling symmetry, we reconsider the evidence of log-periodic precursors to financial crashes and test the prediction that log-periodic oscillations in a financial index are embedded in the mean function of this index. In particular, we examine the first differences of the logarithm of the S&P 500 prior to the October 87 crash and find the log-periodic component of this time series is not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the predictive power of log-periodic functions in this context. The question is still unsettled as of yet (Laloux et al 1999, Feigenbaum 2001, van Bothmer 2003, Chang and Feigenbaum 2006, Gazola et al 2008. Problems are indeed numerous: what definition of a bubble and a crash to adopt (Jacobsen 2009, Lin et al 2009),?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the predictive power of log-periodic functions in this context. The question is still unsettled as of yet (Laloux et al 1999, Feigenbaum 2001, van Bothmer 2003, Chang and Feigenbaum 2006, Gazola et al 2008. Problems are indeed numerous: what definition of a bubble and a crash to adopt (Jacobsen 2009, Lin et al 2009),?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems are indeed numerous: what definition of a bubble and a crash to adopt (Jacobsen 2009, Lin et al 2009),? should the price in a bubble always be increasing (Bothmer and Meister 2003), should one impose constraints on the fitted parameters , where to start a fit of a bubble,y what test of goodness of fit to use,z why having different lengths of the data window greatly affects the parameters of the best fit of the LPPL to the data (Feigenbaum 2001), why leaving out a few data points can alter the parameters of the best fit sufficiently to change a no/bubble decision (Lin et al 2009), and why is the fitting error very sensitive to small (but not large!) changes in one of the parameters of the model (Bre´e and Joseph 2010)?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called log-periodic power law (LPPL) dynamics given by (2) has been previously proposed in different forms in various papers (see for instance Sornette et al [1996], Feigenbaum and Freund [1996], , 2001], Feigenbaum [2001, Zhou and Sornette [2003a], Drozdz et al [2003], Sornette [2004b]). The power law A−B(t c −t i ) β expresses the super-exponential acceleration of prices due to positive feedback mechanisms, alluded to above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with this "king" effect, log-periodic patterns [26] in financial price time series have been found to be precursory signatures of large crashes or large drawdowns [32,6,31,33,34,2,35,7,15,5,17,1] (see also [27,29] and references therein). Most of the analyses have been of a parametric nature, based on formulas involving combinations of powers laws and of log-periodic functions of the type cos[ω ln(t c − t)] [31,13,14], where t c is a "critical" time at or close to the crash.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%