2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscopy --Geodesy -----CCTV ---Impulse response ----Impact echo ---Parallel seismic ---Ultrasonic --Ultrasonic tomography ---Acoustic emission ----Radiographic techniques ---Computer tomography ---Electromagnetic induction -----Radar techniques ---Laser static techniques -----Laser dynamic techniques -----Sclerometric static techniques ----Sclerometric dynamic techniques ----Thermographic passive techniques ----Thermographic active techniques ----Static proof loads -----Dynamic proof In recent years rapid advances in non-destructive 3D optical methods have been made. Using such methods one can obtain a 3D image of the surface of concrete [6][7][8][9][10]. Analysing the image by means of dedicated computer programs one can generate, e.g., the values of 3D roughness parameters in accordance with ISO 25178 [11].…”
Section: Optical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopy --Geodesy -----CCTV ---Impulse response ----Impact echo ---Parallel seismic ---Ultrasonic --Ultrasonic tomography ---Acoustic emission ----Radiographic techniques ---Computer tomography ---Electromagnetic induction -----Radar techniques ---Laser static techniques -----Laser dynamic techniques -----Sclerometric static techniques ----Sclerometric dynamic techniques ----Thermographic passive techniques ----Thermographic active techniques ----Static proof loads -----Dynamic proof In recent years rapid advances in non-destructive 3D optical methods have been made. Using such methods one can obtain a 3D image of the surface of concrete [6][7][8][9][10]. Analysing the image by means of dedicated computer programs one can generate, e.g., the values of 3D roughness parameters in accordance with ISO 25178 [11].…”
Section: Optical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same software was used for constructing the 3-D analyses of the captured images. The analyses results were then used to explain the utilization of the CFRP strips [10,11]. Some researchers refered to the importance of the nature of the CFRP strip-adhesive bond and described the bond as an effective factor in both of decreasing and/or increasing the overall strength and durability of strengthening systems [12,13].…”
Section: Three-dimensional Laser Profilometery Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, results of a previous investigation on strengthened beams with RC layers were used [7], where roughening of concrete interface was made using an air chipping hammer, and an average roughness of 2-3 mm was achieved. There are published recommended methods to characterise and quantify concrete surface texture [49,50]. In this study [7], Sand Patch Test was used.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Strengthened Beams With Uhpfrcmentioning
confidence: 99%