2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-of-the-art protocol to minimize the internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the proportion of MOF‐199 increasing from 0 to 5%, more surface pores were located on the top surface of the composite membrane, with the pore size increasing from 75 nm (M3) to 125 nm (M5) (Figure 2b,b′,c,c′,d,d′). It had been demonstrated previously that the hydrophilic MOF, migrated toward the membrane surface during phase inversion, [ 34 ] and the water unstable MOF (Fe‐MOF, Al‐MOF, Cu‐MOF, etc.,) could be used as a pore former when porous matrix membranes (PMM) were fabricated. [ 2 ] Therefore, MOF‐199 nanomaterials, which possessed hydrophilic nature and water instability, acted as the pore former during the phase inversion, resulting in the porous membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the proportion of MOF‐199 increasing from 0 to 5%, more surface pores were located on the top surface of the composite membrane, with the pore size increasing from 75 nm (M3) to 125 nm (M5) (Figure 2b,b′,c,c′,d,d′). It had been demonstrated previously that the hydrophilic MOF, migrated toward the membrane surface during phase inversion, [ 34 ] and the water unstable MOF (Fe‐MOF, Al‐MOF, Cu‐MOF, etc.,) could be used as a pore former when porous matrix membranes (PMM) were fabricated. [ 2 ] Therefore, MOF‐199 nanomaterials, which possessed hydrophilic nature and water instability, acted as the pore former during the phase inversion, resulting in the porous membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Generally, the essential reason for ICP should be attributed to the lowmass transfer efficiency between the solution inside and outside the substrate. 25 High porosity, large pore channels, and good hydrophilicity can improve the mass transfer efficiency. 26 Hence, the introduction of CC could improve the transfer efficiency and alleviate ICP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICP, which cannot be completely eliminated, is the most adverse feature in the FO process 11 . Generally, the essential reason for ICP should be attributed to the low‐mass transfer efficiency between the solution inside and outside the substrate 25 . High porosity, large pore channels, and good hydrophilicity can improve the mass transfer efficiency 26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After extensive investigation on structural and transport parameters of all fabricated TFC membranes, it is very important to use the characteristic curve for selecting the best membranes . This curve presents a trade‐off between the ratio of J w on theoretical osmotic pressure ( J w /Δ π theo ) and J w / J s (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, they explained the concept of unique membranes, named porous matrix membranes (PMMs) based on water‐unstable MOF crystals as a green template. The fabrication process of PMMs is similar to the conventional MMMs fabrication procedure, with a difference that after the casting of the membrane, the polymer film was then placed into the water bath followed by soaking in continuous flow water to remove MOF particles from the membrane matrix. Compared to common MMMs, the PMMs can significantly enhance the pure water permeability and this might be attributed to the changes in the physical structure of the membrane, as shown in Figure S1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%