Abstract:Summary
In an 18‐year‐old Paso Fino mare presented with mild colic of 36 h duration, a luminal obstruction was found on rectal palpation in the most oral part of the rectum, and this appeared to be caused by a tight band on the left side. A standing procedure was used that involved pararectal dissection with long‐handled instruments to the level of the constricting band, guided by a hand in the rectum. A hooked bistoury designed for treating entrapped epiglottis was used to transect the band, which immediately… Show more
“…Although the approach, as described in the article, was inadequate to allow exploration of the abdomen, it enabled the pedicle of a mass, suspected to be a pedunculated lipoma, obstructing the rectum to be transected (Durket et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ability to explore even the caudalmost aspect of the abdomen of a horse through a pararectal approach was not determined by the authors of the accompanying article, because they were able to relieve the rectal constriction by inserting only the tip of a bistoury into the abdomen of the horse (Durket et al . ). Previously, the use of pararectal incision has been limited to accessing the retroperitoneal portion of the bladder in standing, sedated horses to remove cystic calculi (Van Dongen and Plenderleith ; Abuja et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, if the lesion is located in the left side of the abdominal cavity, as was the case in the study reported here (Durket et al . ), a right‐handed surgeon may experience difficulty operating unwieldy, long‐handled instruments necessary to complete dissection on the left side of the rectum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study reported here (Durket et al . ), financial limitations posed by the client appear to be the primary factor driving the selection of the pararectal approach to resolve a lesion constricting the peritoneal portion of the rectum. An approach through colpotomy was also considered, but apparent inability of the surgeon to insert his/her hand into the mare's vagina eliminated this option.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaginal celiotomy is often referred to as a colpotomy. The pararectal approach described in the accompanying article (Durket et al 2019) is a modification of the G€ okel's approach to the retroperitoneal portion of the bladder, described for removing a cystic calculus. The abdomen can also be explored using laparoscopic techniques, with the laparoscope and instruments inserted at the flank or ventral aspect of the abdomen.…”
Summary
Factors to consider when deciding on a surgical approach to explore the abdomen of a horse include facilities and equipment available, experience of the surgeon, temperament of the horse and the necessity for cosmesis. An approach performed with the horse standing may be necessary when anaesthesia or recovery from anaesthesia is considered risky or when the owner imposes a financial limitation that does not allow surgery to be performed with the horse anaesthetised. Approaches performed with the horse standing include the flank and colpotomy approaches. Each approach has benefits and risks inherent to it.
“…Although the approach, as described in the article, was inadequate to allow exploration of the abdomen, it enabled the pedicle of a mass, suspected to be a pedunculated lipoma, obstructing the rectum to be transected (Durket et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ability to explore even the caudalmost aspect of the abdomen of a horse through a pararectal approach was not determined by the authors of the accompanying article, because they were able to relieve the rectal constriction by inserting only the tip of a bistoury into the abdomen of the horse (Durket et al . ). Previously, the use of pararectal incision has been limited to accessing the retroperitoneal portion of the bladder in standing, sedated horses to remove cystic calculi (Van Dongen and Plenderleith ; Abuja et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, if the lesion is located in the left side of the abdominal cavity, as was the case in the study reported here (Durket et al . ), a right‐handed surgeon may experience difficulty operating unwieldy, long‐handled instruments necessary to complete dissection on the left side of the rectum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study reported here (Durket et al . ), financial limitations posed by the client appear to be the primary factor driving the selection of the pararectal approach to resolve a lesion constricting the peritoneal portion of the rectum. An approach through colpotomy was also considered, but apparent inability of the surgeon to insert his/her hand into the mare's vagina eliminated this option.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaginal celiotomy is often referred to as a colpotomy. The pararectal approach described in the accompanying article (Durket et al 2019) is a modification of the G€ okel's approach to the retroperitoneal portion of the bladder, described for removing a cystic calculus. The abdomen can also be explored using laparoscopic techniques, with the laparoscope and instruments inserted at the flank or ventral aspect of the abdomen.…”
Summary
Factors to consider when deciding on a surgical approach to explore the abdomen of a horse include facilities and equipment available, experience of the surgeon, temperament of the horse and the necessity for cosmesis. An approach performed with the horse standing may be necessary when anaesthesia or recovery from anaesthesia is considered risky or when the owner imposes a financial limitation that does not allow surgery to be performed with the horse anaesthetised. Approaches performed with the horse standing include the flank and colpotomy approaches. Each approach has benefits and risks inherent to it.
BackgroundSurgical approaches to the equine rectum and perirectal area are described in the literature. However, surgeries in this region can be challenging.ObjectiveTo describe the surgical anatomy of the presacral space and to evaluate its access using a retroperitoneoscopic approach.Study designEx vivo experiment.MethodsPreliminary dissections were performed in two cadavers to define the boundaries of the presacral space and to determine portal locations for the surgical approach. After that, nine cadavers were used for experimental presacral retroperitoneoscopic procedure in a standing position. Following retroperitoneoscopy, cadavers were dissected to confirm the anatomical structures observed during the endoscopic procedures, to control the location of each portal and to record iatrogenic trauma.ResultsThe presacral space was bordered by the vertebral column from the ventral aspect of lumbosacral promontorium to the first coccygeal vertebra dorsally and by the presacral fascia and peritoneum ventrally. Lateral limits were composed of the sacrosciatic ligament and transversalis fascia. Cranial and caudal borders were composed of the peritoneum and coccygeal and levator ani muscles respectively. Retroperitoneoscopic portals were placed between the external anal sphincter and semimembranosus muscles and between the base of the tail and the external anal sphincter muscle through the anococcygeal fascia to enter the space by its caudal border. The retroperitoneal space was reached in all cases and the dorsal and lateral aspects of the rectum were visualised after creation of a working space.Main limitationsUse of cadaver specimens do not permit to evaluate the tolerance in living animals and the surgical complications such as rectal damage, haemorrhage and infection.ConclusionThis study provides an anatomical description and surgical access of the presacral space with a minimal invasive approach. Retroperitoneoscopy allows access to the rectum and the dorsal aspect of the pelvis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.