2018
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20180815-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Standardized Clinical Performance Grading Rubric: Reliability Assessment

Abstract: Use of the grading rubric was effective in measuring student clinical performance and provided an objective grade calculation for any level student. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(9):544-548.].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, Kopp (2018) stated that no correlation was found between final written examination and clinical performance evaluations (r = .16, p > 0.05), and a significant difference was noted between written examination ( x = 0.973) and clinical performance evaluations ( x = 0.92; t = 14.54; p < 0.001). [18] Although 3 studies have contradicted the findings of the current study, but the findings of study are mostly supported by 5 similar other studies which explained the direct causal relationship between the level of scientific inquiry for theoretical knowledge and clinical performance, competency and proficiency among nursing students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, Kopp (2018) stated that no correlation was found between final written examination and clinical performance evaluations (r = .16, p > 0.05), and a significant difference was noted between written examination ( x = 0.973) and clinical performance evaluations ( x = 0.92; t = 14.54; p < 0.001). [18] Although 3 studies have contradicted the findings of the current study, but the findings of study are mostly supported by 5 similar other studies which explained the direct causal relationship between the level of scientific inquiry for theoretical knowledge and clinical performance, competency and proficiency among nursing students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Hence, clinical performance is viewed as a primary and fundamental content of nursing quality [17]. Moreover, Kopp (2018) stated that a statistically significant improvement was found between midterm ( x = 0.89) and final performance ( x = 0.94; t = −15.90; p < 0.001, two-tailed) showing an increase in final clinical performance among student nurses using the grading rubric [18]. Also, the clinical performance mean score among nursing students was significantly high as cited by Malekzadeh (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating a reliable assessment tool improves student and instructor evaluation practices. 26,29 Reliability refers to how consistent the rubric can demonstrate similar results when scored by multiple raters. 30 Ideally, an interrater assessment includes both correlation and agreement between measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper evaluator training and mentoring are vital for consistent scoring. 29 Adding an educational conceptual framework to EOL communication research could help enlighten how and why education is worthwhile. The theory of cognitive dissonance portrays how attitudes and understanding can change when a person is placed in an uncomfortable situation requiring behavioral actions.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation