2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stable discontinuity-enriched finite element method for 3-D problems containing weak and strong discontinuities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of enriched finite element methods in topology optimization approaches is not new; the eXtended/Generalized Finite Element Method (X/GFEM) (Oden et al 1998;Moës et al 1999;Moës et al 2003;Belytschko et al 2009;Aragón et al 2010), for example, has been explored in this context. However, the Interface-enriched Generalized Finite Element Method (IGFEM) has been shown to have many advantages over X/GFEM (Soghrati et al 2012a;van den Boom et al 2019a). In this work, we extend IGFEM to be used in a level set-based topology optimization framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of enriched finite element methods in topology optimization approaches is not new; the eXtended/Generalized Finite Element Method (X/GFEM) (Oden et al 1998;Moës et al 1999;Moës et al 2003;Belytschko et al 2009;Aragón et al 2010), for example, has been explored in this context. However, the Interface-enriched Generalized Finite Element Method (IGFEM) has been shown to have many advantages over X/GFEM (Soghrati et al 2012a;van den Boom et al 2019a). In this work, we extend IGFEM to be used in a level set-based topology optimization framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, enrichment functions are exactly zero at original mesh nodes. Therefore, original mesh nodes retain their physical meaning and essential boundary conditions can be enforced directly on non-matching edges (Cuba-Ramos et al 2015;Aragón and Simone 2017;van den Boom et al 2019a). It was shown that IGFEM is optimally convergent under mesh refinement for problems without singularities (Soghrati et al 2012a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enriched nodes need to be placed along the boundary, and integration elements need to be created. These geometric operations can be done efficiently but require specialized code: a geometric engine The hierarchical construction of enrichment functions calls for a dedicated data structure, such as an ordered tree, to store the hierarchy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the flexibility of dealing with both discontinuity types, DE‐FEM inherits all of the virtues of IGFEM/HIFEM: The construction of both weak and strong enrichment functions is straightforward, as they are based on the standard Lagrange shape functions of integration elements; Because enrichment functions vanish at original mesh nodes, the Kronecker‐delta property is maintained in standard nodes, allowing essential boundary conditions to be applied in the same way as in standard FEM; With the use of a diagonal preconditioner, or a proper scaling factor for the enrichment functions, the formulation used for treating weak discontinuities is stable, ie, the condition number increases at the same rate as that of standard FEM under mesh refinement; A hierarchical implementation of DE‐FEM can analyze multiple discontinuities and n ‐junctions within a single element. Cracks and interfaces are allowed to intersect each other as well …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the first term on the right-hand-side of (7) corresponds to the traditional interpolation based on the shape functions and field values at the M nonconforming nodes, and the second term denotes the enriched component of the solution associated with the Q weakly (C 0 ) or strongly (C −1 ) discontinuous enrichment functions Ψ j and generalized degrees of freedom f j . 41 Beyond the simplicity of the meshing process, the main advantages of adopting the IGFEM in this multiscale shape optimization study resides in the stationary nature of the underlying nonconforming mesh, which simplifies the computation of the shape sensitivities and eliminates issues associated with mesh distortion. 16,[42][43][44] When C −1 enrichments are used to capture the strong discontinuity along the cohesive interfaces, every enrichment node has a corresponding "mirror node" tied by the cohesive failure law, as shown in Figure 2 for the case of a linear tetrahedral element traversed by a single material interface.…”
Section: Interface-enriched Generalized Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%