2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.765211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stabilized, Monomeric, Receptor Binding Domain Elicits High-Titer Neutralizing Antibodies Against All SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern

Abstract: Saturation suppressor mutagenesis was used to generate thermostable mutants of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD). A triple mutant with an increase in thermal melting temperature of ~7°C with respect to the wild-type B.1 RBD and was expressed in high yield in both mammalian cells and the microbial host, Pichia pastoris, was downselected for immunogenicity studies. An additional derivative with three additional mutations from the B.1.351 (beta) isolate was also introduced into this background. L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combing individual mutants from deep mutational scans has limitations and that there are often trade offs between enhancements in stability and binding (47). However, by combining putative stabilizing mutations which are not close to each other or active-site residues we believe that significant stabilization is possible without negatively impacting binding affinity as we have demonstrated both for CcdB in the present work and for the RBD for SARS-CoV-2 in another study (38). Overall the present methodology offers a robust pathway to identify stabilizing mutations in any protein of interest for which a surface display based binding screen is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combing individual mutants from deep mutational scans has limitations and that there are often trade offs between enhancements in stability and binding (47). However, by combining putative stabilizing mutations which are not close to each other or active-site residues we believe that significant stabilization is possible without negatively impacting binding affinity as we have demonstrated both for CcdB in the present work and for the RBD for SARS-CoV-2 in another study (38). Overall the present methodology offers a robust pathway to identify stabilizing mutations in any protein of interest for which a surface display based binding screen is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In related work, we have stabilized the receptor binding domain of the Spike S protein of SARS-COV-2 using saturation suppressor mutagenesis (38). We identified several stabilizing mutations and could stabilize the protein by 8 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These suppressors, D389E, L390M and P527I are located on the protein surface (Figure 5G). When individually introduced into WT mRBD, they show a ΔT m of ∼3 °C (Figure 5H) (11). The suppressors were also subjected to unfolding (in 3 M GdnCl) and refolding (in 0.5 M GdnCl) kinetic studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to efforts to induce higher antibody levels in individuals (for example through booster vaccination with homologous antigens), another approach is regular vaccine matching to current circulating variants, and/or customisation of vaccine formulations to include wild-type sequences and any relevant mutations in antigenic sites. The mRBD1-3.2 + mRBD1-3.2-beta antigen used in the formulation of Vaccine 3 in this study [10,11] was prepared using wild-type and Beta variant sequences at the time when the latter was a major concern. Although not statistically significant, there was a slightly stronger neutralisation of Omicron BA.1.1 by serum samples collected from mice immunised with this antigen, compared to only WT antigen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This vaccine is due to enter Phase I human clinical trials soon, and elicits high antibody titers in mice that received prime-boost immunisations on Days 0, 21 and 42 against the wildtype SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have previously shown that ELISA and neutralisation titers are virtually identical post the first and second boosts [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%