2021
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2020.3007090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stability Criterion for Networked Control Systems With Packetized Transmissions

Abstract: A networked output feedback loop subject to packetized transmissions of the output signal is considered. Based on the small gain theorem, an easy-to-use stability criterion covering two important cases is presented. In the first case a packet numbering mechanism is employed whereas in the second case neither packet numbering nor synchronization between sender and receiver is assumed. The analysis makes use of acausal subsystems and deduces the optimal constant time delay that should be used in a nominal contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure A.2 extends the analysis to different̂N , T and acausal delays A , where also the minimal delay − A and maximal delaŷN − A are indicated. All resulting delay patterns and output sequences show a similar structure as for the causal case [11], with the important differences that: (i) a maximal relative delaȳ A.2 Protocol  3 The calculation of * is more demanding for protocol  3 , because the delay patterns from the previous section only partially reproduce gains T , for example for  3 and A =̂N . This is visualized in Figure A.11 using blue plus signs.…”
Section: A1mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure A.2 extends the analysis to different̂N , T and acausal delays A , where also the minimal delay − A and maximal delaŷN − A are indicated. All resulting delay patterns and output sequences show a similar structure as for the causal case [11], with the important differences that: (i) a maximal relative delaȳ A.2 Protocol  3 The calculation of * is more demanding for protocol  3 , because the delay patterns from the previous section only partially reproduce gains T , for example for  3 and A =̂N . This is visualized in Figure A.11 using blue plus signs.…”
Section: A1mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Remark 5. For the causal case, that is for A = 0, one obtains the same conditions as (i) in [11] for a unity feedback loop [12] for a NCS with a filtered Smith predictor, R(z…”
Section: Definition 3 (Finite Gain 2 Stability) a Mapping (Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A way to include protocols like P 1 and P 2 has been proposed in [33]. This work is extended in the following for networked feedback loops with filtered Smith predictors (see Fig.…”
Section: Stability Analysis Based On the Small Gain Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a basis for the present work, the small gain [31], [32] based stability criterion for networked feedback loops with bounded time-varying delays presented in [33] is used. The present work extends this approach with respect to several aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%