Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1993) 1993
DOI: 10.21437/eurospeech.1993-428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spoken dialogue system for German intercity train timetable inquiries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments were performed on the EVAR corpus of spontaneous speech data collected by our spoken dialog system [3,13] which is able to answer inquiries about German Intercity train connections. The data were divided into a training sample, a validation sample and a test sample (Table 1).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experiments were performed on the EVAR corpus of spontaneous speech data collected by our spoken dialog system [3,13] which is able to answer inquiries about German Intercity train connections. The data were divided into a training sample, a validation sample and a test sample (Table 1).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other applications like information retrieval over the telephone the user might not even know that the system misrecognized because of an OOV word. So if a user asks our train timetable inquiry system [3] "I want to go from Sussex" and Sussex is not in the lexicon, the system might recognize I want to go at six and it might respond with "You want to leave at six o'clock. Where do you want to go?".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WA e v aluates the performance of the speech recognition component, the language understanding capabilities of a system can be judged by concept accuracy (CA). 3 This approach is based on the assumption that the main task of the linguistic processor in a spoken dialogue system is to extract the propositional content from the spoken utterance. Furthermore, it is assumed that this propositional content can be represented as a list of semantic units (SU) taking the form of attribute-value pairs.…”
Section: Concept Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given such semantic reference answers in form of task parameter-value pairs the performance of a speech understanding component can be measured in analogy with the 3 In [10] a similar measure was called information content.…”
Section: Concept Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation