2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10114-016-5625-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A splitting primal-dual proximity algorithm for solving composite optimization problems

Abstract: Our work considers the optimization of the sum of a non-smooth convex function and a finite family of composite convex functions, each one of which is composed of a convex function and a bounded linear operator. This type of problem is associated with many interesting challenges encountered in the image restoration and image reconstruction fields. We developed a splitting primal-dual proximity algorithm to solve this problem. Further, we propose a preconditioned method, of which the iterative parameters are ob… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We set γ = 1.9/( A 2 + ρ 1 D 1 2 + ρ 2 D 2 2 ) and ρ 1 = ρ 2 = 1 for ADMM. For SPDP and Pre-SPDP, the parameters are set to be the same as those in [7]. We select Algorithm 4. as the total variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We set γ = 1.9/( A 2 + ρ 1 D 1 2 + ρ 2 D 2 2 ) and ρ 1 = ρ 2 = 1 for ADMM. For SPDP and Pre-SPDP, the parameters are set to be the same as those in [7]. We select Algorithm 4. as the total variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will employ the proposed iterative algorithms to solve an optimization model that is suitable for reconstructing computed tomography (CT) images from a set of undersampled and potentially noisy projection measurements. The proposed iterative algorithms are compared with several representative algorithms, including ADMM [36], splitting primal-dual proximity algorithm (SPDP) [7], and preconditioned SPDP (Pre-SPDP) [7]. All the experiments are accomplished by Matlab and on a standard Lenovo laptop with Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4712MQ 2.3GHz CPU and 4GB RAM.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We mention in passing that similar techniques are also adopted in [8,4,12,14]. Compared to the schemes developed in [8,12,14], if a scheme is established based on PDFP with f 1 nonzero in (1.4), it's more convenient for us to choose parameters in applications, as shown in [5]. However, if a scheme is constructed based on PDFP by viewing f 1 equal to 0, it requires to compute an additional symmetric step.…”
Section: C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the PDFP algorithm can be applied and formulated in parallel form due to the separability of f 2 on its variables. Similar technique has also been used in [8,4,12,14] and we present the details here for completeness.…”
Section: Algorithm and Its Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%