A Splintered Heartland: Russia, Europe, and the Geopolitics of Networked Energy Infrastructure

Abstract

Abstract:Much has been made about a revival of Mackinderian geopolitics in Eurasia, largely centred on struggles over access to energy resources and rooted in a territorial understanding of space. This paper proposes that the conceptual political cartography of Eurasia is indeed largely being rewritten, but conventional understandings of space, territory, and resources are insufficient in providing insight into a changing geopolitics. We interrogate the geographical logics of Russia's role as energy provider to Europe by focusing specifically on the provision of gas to Europe via Nord Stream, a new underwater pipeline that is scheduled to go online by late 2011. Drawing on debates in human geography on relational/topological views of space, and on the "splintering urbanism" thesis, the paper describes a rapidly evolving networked space that effectively "splinters" the territorial integrity of the region and thereby complicates notions of Eurasian geopolitics that emphasise proximity, territorial hegemony, and state-centric international relations. geopolitics | energy infrastructure | Russia | Europe | energy networks | underwater

The Maritime Tiger: Exploring South Korea’s Interests and Role in the Arctic

“…As Johnson and Derrick remind us in their study of pipelines and networked energy infrastructure, classical geopolitics' focus on territorial proximity overlooks Strategic Analysis the importance of connectivity. 70 Viewing the Arctic in a more topological, networkbased manner rather than privileging territorial proximity provides a more robust way of understanding the region's new dynamics in the energy trade.…”

Beyond the subterranean energy regime? Fuel, land use and the production of space

“…Critical scholars who focus on energy and space, focus mainly on energy (mostly oil) as an object of political power, states, corporations and inter‐imperialist rivalry (O'Connor ; Podobnik ; Labban ; Mitchell ), or on the role of state control over energy in larger politics of state formation, national identity and social movements (Coronil ; Watts ; Perreault and Valdivia 2010). Furthermore, new scholarship on energy has emphasised the intense politics that surround the networks of energy distribution – particularly pipelines (Bouzarovski and Konieczny ; Johnson and Derrick ; Barry ). In this view, energy is a strategic object ‘in space’ along with other fixed networks of energy provision (pipelines, choke points, electric grids) that, if controlled, allows for regimes of power to be reproduced.…”

Bringing Geopolitics Back In: Russia's Foreign Policy and Its Relations with the Post-Soviet Space

“…Gas agreements differ from regular trade relations in that they make it impossible to switch to different partners overnight and, therefore, make all the parties involved—producers, consumers, and transit states—dependent on each other and tightly laced to each other's politics. In other words, energy infrastructure “structures, frames and connects space” (Johnson and Derrick :492).…”

“…Johnson and Derrick (:496) note that the existing and proposed pipeline projects in Eurasia involving Russia “constitut[e] an underappreciated form of spatial interconnectivity” and that studying these projects can enrich the conceptualization of Eurasian space and energy relations more broadly. Pipeline connectivity can be an important spatial variable that casts space in relational or relative terms.…”