2010
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2010)099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spin chain for the symmetric product CFT2

Abstract: We consider "gauge invariant" operators in Sym N T 4 , the symmetric product orbifold of N copies of the 2d supersymmetric sigma model with T 4 target. We discuss a spin chain representation for single-cycle operators and study their two point functions at large N . We perform systematic calculations at the orbifold point ("tree level"), where non-trivial mixing is already present, and some sample calculations to first order in the blow-up mode of the orbifold ("one loop").

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(140 reference statements)
2
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it appears to be much harder to understand the spin-chain picture starting from the Sym N (T 4 ) orbifold point [45], though many suggestive connections seem to exist. It would be interesting to see whether it is possible to deform the spin-chain [18,22] to approach the Sym N (T 4 ) orbifold point.…”
Section: Jhep06(2015)103mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it appears to be much harder to understand the spin-chain picture starting from the Sym N (T 4 ) orbifold point [45], though many suggestive connections seem to exist. It would be interesting to see whether it is possible to deform the spin-chain [18,22] to approach the Sym N (T 4 ) orbifold point.…”
Section: Jhep06(2015)103mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] and references there) it is hard to comment on the possible meaning of (4.1) or (4.2) in the small string tension or weak coupling region h → 0. In general, the identification of the parameter h in (4.1) with the string tension √ λ 2π in (2.2) may be true only in the strong-coupling limit √ λ ≫ 1, i.e.…”
Section: General Structure and Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the combination that should appear in front of log in ϑ 0 in (5.29) is 18 Note that because of the ambiguity discussed beneath eq. (5.26), to find S 2 ± we cannot use the same procedure as used for S 1 ± starting with the q = 0 expression given in [5].…”
Section: Q = 0 Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin-chain in this case is not alternating; instead it is homogenous. It would be very interesting to see how such a spin-chain emerges from the recent analysis of the weakly-coupled CFT 2 [58]. When restricted to just the left-or right-movers this spinchain is closely related to the psu(1, 1|2) spin-chain one encounters in N = 4 SYM [59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%