2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-009-0130-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spherical discrete element model: calibration procedure and incremental response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once these three parameters are calibrated with high accuracy (posterior probability), the true values for the rolling parameters β m and η m can be identified by tuning the evolution of post-peak stress ratio over axial or deviatoric strain. It is worth noting that this technique is often adopted in the literature, because rolling stiffness and rolling friction can significantly affect the bulk shear strength, but have a negligible influence on the initial elastic behavior and dilatancy of a dense granular material [38].…”
Section: Correlations Between Micro-and Macro-mechanical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once these three parameters are calibrated with high accuracy (posterior probability), the true values for the rolling parameters β m and η m can be identified by tuning the evolution of post-peak stress ratio over axial or deviatoric strain. It is worth noting that this technique is often adopted in the literature, because rolling stiffness and rolling friction can significantly affect the bulk shear strength, but have a negligible influence on the initial elastic behavior and dilatancy of a dense granular material [38].…”
Section: Correlations Between Micro-and Macro-mechanical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DEM simulations of rocks [7,27,50] in which intergranular forces depend linearly on relative displacements between adjoining grains, a linear correlation between the bulk Young's modulus and the normal contact stiffness was identified, whereas a nonlinear correlation was found for sandy soils [38]. Given a constant value for the normal contact stiffness, both Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were found to be linearly related to the tangential contact stiffness [4,38], despite the fact that normal and tangential stiffnesses can jointly affect the deformability of a granular material. The micromechanical parameters that characterize deformability (e.g., contact stiffnesses) and yield (e.g., intergranular friction angle), however, are generally believed to be uncoupled, and thus can be calibrated separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example [3,39] once calibrated, the predictive capabilities of the numerical model will be checked by simulating other triaxial tests. For the calibration step, the selected local parameters are: K n , K s , K r (or β r ), µ and η r .…”
Section: Calibration Of the Local Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for DEM numerical simulations, previous studies highlight the great influence of microscopic friction on the volumetric response [34,62]. Taking into account the facts previously commented, in the present investigation the replication of the experimental soil condition during DEM simulations involves the implementation of a new inter-particle friction coefficient in the true triaxial code.…”
Section: Relative Densitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although there is no real soil with constant microscopic friction values for every particle, this is a possibility of the numerical simulation and renders a convenient method to obtain the dense state required here. It is worth to mention that typical friction values for sands range between 0.3 and 0.6; the use of such values would only produce loose samples [62].…”
Section: Relative Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%