1990
DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(90)90023-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spelling correction method and its application to an OCR system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system is designed around common knowledge about typical OCR errors and dynamic knowledge which is gathered as the user interactively spell checks a document. Approximate string matching techniques [26,25] are used to determine what we refer to as confusions. Consider the following misspelling:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is designed around common knowledge about typical OCR errors and dynamic knowledge which is gathered as the user interactively spell checks a document. Approximate string matching techniques [26,25] are used to determine what we refer to as confusions. Consider the following misspelling:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metric is well suited for touch-typed text but other metrics should be used for texts entered in other ways; for instance, hand-written text, and texts that have been entered using OCRtechniques, see Takahashi et al (1990) and the section below, are likely to contain different types of errors.…”
Section: Spelling Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In earlier studies of automatic spelling correction, see for instance Takahashi et al (1990), it has been considered impractical to use word lists larger than about 10,000 words. Using our methods, it is possible to have extremely large word lists without having to sacrifice speed.…”
Section: Spelling Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focus on automatic spelling correction (Accomazzi, Eichhorn, Kurtz, Grant, & Murray, 2000;Angell, Freund, & Willett, 1983;Blair, 1960;Cucerzan & Brill, 2004;Damerau & Mays, 1989;Davidson, 1962;Gadd, 1988;Kukich, 1992;Landau & Vishkin, 1986;Petersen, 1986;Pollock & Zamora, 1984;Rogers & Willett, 1991;Takahashi, Itoh, Amano, & Yamashita, 1990;Ullmann, 1977;Zobel & Dart, 1995). A number of studies have highlighted the context for correcting such errors and eliminating ambiguity (Damerau, 1964;Hull, 1992;Mays, Damerau, & Mercer, 1991;Riseman & Ehrich, 1971;Schulz & Mihov, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%