2015
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
4
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The falling sensitivity of our redshift catalog (Momcheva et al 2015) results in few groups above z0.6. Four of nine of the lenses with z>0.6 either have only a photometric redshift or an uncertain spectroscopic redshift, so we do not assign them group membership.…”
Section: Lens Groupsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The falling sensitivity of our redshift catalog (Momcheva et al 2015) results in few groups above z0.6. Four of nine of the lenses with z>0.6 either have only a photometric redshift or an uncertain spectroscopic redshift, so we do not assign them group membership.…”
Section: Lens Groupsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The lens sample selection is described in Momcheva et al (2015). It depended in part on the ancillary data available at the Wilson et al (2016).…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that there may be other galaxies within this magnitude range and radius from the lens which are also part of the galaxy group associated with the lensing galaxy, but which are missed due to spectroscopic incompleteness. In Section 5.1.3 we have specifically computed the lensing properties of this group, based on its physical properties derived by Momcheva et al (2015). As a result, when we compute κ ext at the location of the lens, using the weighted number counts approach, we must remove the galaxies which are part of this group, as the convergence from the group has already been included in the lensing models, and must not be double-counted.…”
Section: Appendix D: Accounting For the Missing Galaxy Group Members mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean-field-dynamo model predicts that the axisymmetric mode is the strongest mode excited in a galactic disk and that the random field is expected to dominate over the coherent field 29 , as observed here. On-going star formation in this z = 0.439 galaxy, indicated by strong O[II] lines in its spectrum 12,30 , and subsequent supernova explosions can drive turbulence and therefore the alpha-effect, which is a necessary ingredient for the mean-field dynamo 11,29 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%