2012
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02176-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Species-Specific Amino Acid Difference in the Macaque CD4 Receptor Restricts Replication by Global Circulating HIV-1 Variants Representing Viruses from Recent Infection

Abstract: bHIV-1 replicates poorly in macaque cells, and this had hindered the advancement of relevant nonhuman primate model systems for HIV-1 infection and pathogenesis. Several host restriction factors have been identified that contribute to this species-specific restriction to HIV-1 replication, but these do not fully explain the poor replication of most strains of HIV-1 in macaque cells. Only select HIV-1 envelope variants, typically those derived from viruses that have been adapted in cell culture, result in infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further show that a key determinant of the greater neutralization by human CD4-Ig is residue 39, an asparagine in human CD4 but an isoleucine in the rhesus ortholog. This observation is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that this CD4 residue can also account for the ability of various SHIVs to utilize human CD4 more efficiently than rhesus CD4 (13,15). While it is not unexpected that SHIVs, whose Envs are derived from HIV-1, would utilize human CD4 more efficiently, SIV's preference for human CD4 requires greater explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We further show that a key determinant of the greater neutralization by human CD4-Ig is residue 39, an asparagine in human CD4 but an isoleucine in the rhesus ortholog. This observation is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that this CD4 residue can also account for the ability of various SHIVs to utilize human CD4 more efficiently than rhesus CD4 (13,15). While it is not unexpected that SHIVs, whose Envs are derived from HIV-1, would utilize human CD4 more efficiently, SIV's preference for human CD4 requires greater explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We have previously observed that huCD4-Ig more efficiently neutralizes various HIV-1 Envs than does a CD4-Ig variant with rhesus CD4 and Fc domains (15). As suggested by Humes et al (13), we also observed that introduction of human CD4 asparagine 39 into this rhesus CD4-Ig construct neutralized HIV-1 isolates with efficiencies similar to huCD4-Ig (15). To focus our current studies on the CD4 domains of these constructs, here we used a common human IgG1 Fc domain for huCD4-Ig, rhCD4-Ig, and rhCD4-Ig variants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, while some differences between human and rhesus CD4/CCR5 have been reported (24,26,27), we decided to use both human CD4-Ig and cells expressing human CCR5 to be consistent with previous studies characterizing the HIV and SIV gp120 inner domain layers (15,16). For CCR5 binding, normalized amounts of radiolabeled SIVmac239 gp120 envelope glycoproteins were incubated in the presence or absence of 200 nM soluble CD4 (sCD4) for 1 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%