2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatially explicit index for mapping Forest Restoration Vocation (FRV) at the landscape scale: Application in the Rio Doce basin, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the notion of landscape was used in reference to the following aspects of NBS called as a context groups (presented in the order of number of publications) (Fig. 2 ), SCALE: Landscape as a scale of NBS project implementation , discussed in 19 publications (IUCN 2016 , 2020 ; Moosavi 2017 ; Raymond et al 2017 ; Thorslund et al 2017 ; Groß et al 2018 ; Guerrero et al 2018 ; Quin and Destouni 2018 ; Carvalho Ribeiro et al 2020 ; European Commission 2020a , b ; Kopp and Preis 2020 ; Science for Environment Policy 2021 ; Solheim et al 2021 ; van Rooij et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2021 ; Zandersen et al 2021 Bunclark and Vega Hernández 2022 ; Sušnik et al 2022 ). INDICATORS: Application of landscape-based indicators to assess the environmental impacts of NBS , discussed in 16 publications (European Commission 2015 ; Fan et al 2017 ; Raymond et al 2017 ; Tomao et al 2017 ; Thorslund et al 2018 ; Makido et al 2019 ; Zawadzka et al 2019 ; Lee et al 2020 ; Ranagalage et al 2020 ; Sowińska-Świerkosz et al 2021b ; Baldwin et al 2022 ; Kalantari et al 2022 ; Li et al 2022a , b ; Préau et al 2022 ; Schmidt et al 2022 ; Vasiliev and Greenwood 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the notion of landscape was used in reference to the following aspects of NBS called as a context groups (presented in the order of number of publications) (Fig. 2 ), SCALE: Landscape as a scale of NBS project implementation , discussed in 19 publications (IUCN 2016 , 2020 ; Moosavi 2017 ; Raymond et al 2017 ; Thorslund et al 2017 ; Groß et al 2018 ; Guerrero et al 2018 ; Quin and Destouni 2018 ; Carvalho Ribeiro et al 2020 ; European Commission 2020a , b ; Kopp and Preis 2020 ; Science for Environment Policy 2021 ; Solheim et al 2021 ; van Rooij et al 2021 ; Wu et al 2021 ; Zandersen et al 2021 Bunclark and Vega Hernández 2022 ; Sušnik et al 2022 ). INDICATORS: Application of landscape-based indicators to assess the environmental impacts of NBS , discussed in 16 publications (European Commission 2015 ; Fan et al 2017 ; Raymond et al 2017 ; Tomao et al 2017 ; Thorslund et al 2018 ; Makido et al 2019 ; Zawadzka et al 2019 ; Lee et al 2020 ; Ranagalage et al 2020 ; Sowińska-Świerkosz et al 2021b ; Baldwin et al 2022 ; Kalantari et al 2022 ; Li et al 2022a , b ; Préau et al 2022 ; Schmidt et al 2022 ; Vasiliev and Greenwood 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local terrain characteristics remain significant even when other land cover and socioeconomic variables are added. Carvalho Ribeiro et al (2020) presuppose that concave areas have local terrain characteristics that favor natural regeneration because they accumulate soil and water. However, our model identified that flat areas are more relevant for natural regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, one challenge for employing passive restoration methods is the difficulty to reliably predict the future species composition (Vickers et al 2011). In the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, previous studies have estimated the natural regeneration potential using empirical analysis based on multiple biophysical, land use history, and socioeconomic factors (Silva et al 2016a;Molin et al 2018;Strassburg et al 2018;Carvalho Ribeiro et al 2020), without differentiating, in most cases, the factors influencing the ecological regeneration process from the socioeconomic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facing this problem, a study dedicated efforts to the development of toolkits capable of assisting government and non‐government organizations in offering landowners solutions for complying with the BFC requirements while promoting positive outcomes for the environment (Oakleaf et al, 2017). With an identical goal, other works used Multicriteria‐like assessments to prioritize sites for LR allocation (Rodrigues et al, 2022) and map forest restoration vocation (Carvalho‐Ribeiro et al, 2020); or used interviews‐based approaches to understand landholders' perceptions on the legal reserve and forest restoration options in areas under agriculture intensification and forest deficits (Borda‐Niño et al, 2021; Brito, 2020; Pinillos et al, 2021; Richards et al, 2020). Finally, a study explored scenarios based on the BFC and the National Policy for the Payment for Ecosystem Services to investigate the cost‐effectiveness of different forest landscape restoration strategies for achieving multiple benefits, namely biodiversity conservation, carbon stock increase, and soil‐loss reduction (Lemos et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%